Tim Cross writes:
> IMO there is no trademark issue here. Neither Emacs or org-mode have any
> trademark ownership over the term 'Org' or any word which has 'org' in
> it, like beorg.
Indeed, thanks for clarifying this Tim.
Otherwise, we could claim some ownership on a large part of the World
maybe they could get incentive to make
> it free software too.
>
>
This has nothing to do with defining a formal grammar for org mode.
Please refrain from hijacking threads in this manner. If something in a
thread makes you think of another issue (such as trademarks) or some
other
* Jakob Schöttl [2021-06-02 11:23]:
> I haven't tried BeOrg myself, but it's proprietary and we have an open
> source, platform-independent alternative with Organice. See also
> https://github.com/200ok-ch/organice#beorg
As "Org" started first, it would be better that author ask the company
to
Jakob Schöttl writes:
> Am 02.06.21 um 06:00 schrieb David Masterson:
>> Jakob Schöttl writes:
>>
>>> Am 01.06.21 um 11:53 schrieb Tom Gillespie:
> We have a pretty similar project, org-parser[1]. It's also written
> in a Lisp dialect, Clojure, but it uses instaparse instead of brag
Am 02.06.21 um 06:00 schrieb David Masterson:
Jakob Schöttl writes:
Am 01.06.21 um 11:53 schrieb Tom Gillespie:
We have a pretty similar project, org-parser[1]. It's also written
in a Lisp dialect, Clojure, but it uses instaparse instead of brag
as parser library.
Jakob Schöttl writes:
> Am 01.06.21 um 11:53 schrieb Tom Gillespie:
>>
>>> We have a pretty similar project, org-parser[1]. It's also written
>>> in a Lisp dialect, Clojure, but it uses instaparse instead of brag
>>> as parser library.
>>
Am 01.06.21 um 11:53 schrieb Tom Gillespie:
We have a pretty similar project, org-parser[1]. It's also written in a Lisp
dialect, Clojure, but it uses instaparse instead of brag as parser library.
https://github.com/tgbugs/laundry/tree/next#similar-projects I managed
to get it into my
Hi Jakob,
Thank you for getting in touch. I had been meaning to after
someone pointed me to your repo in a reddit thread, but you beat me to
it. Replies in line. Best!
Tom
PS ccing this back to the list for the record.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 1:56 AM Jakob Schöttl wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I
Dear all,
Here is a draft of a formal grammar for Org mode [1]. It is still
in a rough state, despite quite a bit of work. However, following some
changes to improve performance for parsing real (big) Org files, I
think it is time to share it with the community so that we can start
to gather
