Pushed as 7111ee7c.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:04 AM Timothy wrote:
> Sounds like the general attitude is “why not?”. So I’ve turned my snippet
> into a
> patch and unless any concerns are raised in the next few days I’ll push it to
> main.
For parity, it would probably make sense to add the equivalent to
oc-natbib
Hi All,
Sounds like the general attitude is “why not?”. So I’ve turned my snippet into a
patch and unless any concerns are raised in the next few days I’ll push it to
main.
All the best,
Timothy
>From 88f8bb7bc8726c20f3cdd4e8d47d1b487b1c2cd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TEC
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2
These would be equivalent to things like \citeauthor{key} in natbib I think.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his)
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitching
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 9:19 AM Timothy wrote:
> > It’s just odd to have a name without any other citation marker. How
> > would a reader know it’s a citation?
>
> For context, I’m basically just using this as a way to insert the author’s
> name
> without any chance of typos.
Right.
I don't see
Hi Bruce,
>> Is there any reason why we haven’t added `a/b’, `a/bc’, `a/bf’, `a/bcf’ ?
>
> There is a reason, though it may not be the strongest.
>
> It’s just odd to have a name without any other citation marker. How
> would a reader know it’s a citation?
For context, I’m basically just using t
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:35 AM Timothy wrote:
> Is there any reason why we haven’t added `a/b', `a/bc', `a/bf', `a/bcf' ?
There is a reason, though it may not be the strongest.
It's just odd to have a name without any other citation marker. How
would a reader know it's a citation?
Is it for ca
Hi All,
I was recently citing something and wanted to mention the author and so tried
[cite/a/b:@] and was surprised to see it didn’t work. Looking at oc-csl.el I see
that we only define the following author variants:
• `a/c'
• `a/f'
• `a/cf'
Is there any reason why we haven’t added `a/b', `a/bc'
