Re: [PATCH] Re: Bug: org-agenda-sort-notime-is-late is not correctly handled by timestamp comparison [9.4.6 (9.4.6-12-gdcc3a8-elpaplus @ /Users/charlestam/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20210830/)]

2022-01-29 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Timothy writes: > I’ve confirmed both your issue report (thanks for the detailed steps), and > your > suggested fix. As such, I’ve produced a patch (attached). It would be good if > someone else could check this looks fine and apply it. I have applied the patch onto bugfix as 1b675f0. The bug

[PATCH] Re: Bug: org-agenda-sort-notime-is-late is not correctly handled by timestamp comparison [9.4.6 (9.4.6-12-gdcc3a8-elpaplus @ /Users/charlestam/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20210830/)]

2021-12-30 Thread Timothy
Hi Charles, Thanks for reporting this, and sorry it’s taken so long for someone to respond (it’s been a busy year for the maintainers). I’ve confirmed both your issue report (thanks for the detailed steps), and your suggested fix. As such, I’ve produced a patch (attached). It would be good if

Bug: org-agenda-sort-notime-is-late is not correctly handled by timestamp comparison [9.4.6 (9.4.6-12-gdcc3a8-elpaplus @ /Users/charlestam/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20210830/)]

2021-09-01 Thread Charles Tam
org-agenda-sorting-strategy claims that scheduled-up (-down) causes items to be sorted in ascending (descending) order by scheduled timestamp. org-agenda-sort-notime-is-late claims that if it is non-nil, the absence of a timestamp is treated as being maximal. Instead, when using the scheduled-up