Timothy writes:
> I’ve confirmed both your issue report (thanks for the detailed steps), and
> your
> suggested fix. As such, I’ve produced a patch (attached). It would be good if
> someone else could check this looks fine and apply it.
I have applied the patch onto bugfix as 1b675f0.
The bug
Hi Charles,
Thanks for reporting this, and sorry it’s taken so long for someone to respond
(it’s been a busy year for the maintainers).
I’ve confirmed both your issue report (thanks for the detailed steps), and your
suggested fix. As such, I’ve produced a patch (attached). It would be good if
org-agenda-sorting-strategy claims that scheduled-up (-down) causes
items to be sorted in ascending (descending) order by scheduled
timestamp.
org-agenda-sort-notime-is-late claims that if it is non-nil, the absence
of a timestamp is treated as being maximal.
Instead, when using the scheduled-up