Ihor Radchenko writes on Sat 11 Feb 2023 18:22:
> We can indeed at such warning, but it will probably be not very
> helpful.
I don't understand this. And isn't it better to have a more accurate
manual anyway?
Apart from that, since the default value in 9.6 is 'smart' ('nil' in
9.5), I wonder
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> At any rate, shouldn't "2.2.3 Catching invisible edits" be a little
> bit more specific about what kind of invisible edits are concerned?
> Or perhaps just a warning that it is not all of them.
We can indeed at such warning, but it will probably be not very help
Ihor Radchenko writes on Fri 10 Feb 2023 09:56:
> Only a handful of interactive commands support invisible edit
> checks. In particular: self-insert-command (typing), deleting char
> forward/backward, and `org-meta-return'.
>
> I guess we may instead provide a defcustom and hook the check in
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
>M-x undo
>
> I visually see no change, but I can observe by unfolding the headline
> that 'bar' has disappeared. In my understanding of the documentation
> above and of the docstring for org-fold-catch-invisible-edits, this
> should only happen with 'nil'.
>
Hello. The documentation (version 9.6) says:
2.2.3 Catching invisible edits
--
Sometimes you may inadvertently edit an invisible part of the
buffer and be confused on what has been edited and how to undo the
mistake. Setting ‘org-fold-catch-invisible