On 18/07/2023 16:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
The footnote on dates in heading title was added in response to
Links to datestamped headings broken? Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:49:14 +1300
3765304c8 2011-06-28 15:30:50 +0200 Bastien Guerry: doc/org.texi:
footnote: don't put
Max Nikulin writes:
> A patch for `org-store-link' tests reminded me about this topic. The
> footnote on dates in heading title was added in response to
>
> Links to datestamped headings broken? Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:49:14 +1300
>
On 03/02/2023 03:37, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
May it happen that in some old Org version timestamps at the end of
headings were removed due by code intended to handle statistics cookie
[1/10]?
I do not see how.
A patch for `org-store-link' tests reminded me about this
Max Nikulin writes:
> May it happen that in some old Org version timestamps at the end of
> headings were removed due by code intended to handle statistics cookie
> [1/10]?
I do not see how.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at
On 19/08/2022 12:58, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Ypo writes:
I found it again:
"If the headline contains a timestamp, it is removed from the link,
which results in a wrong link—you should avoid putting a timestamp in
the headline."
https://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-Links.html#FOOT28
Unless I
alain.coch...@unistra.fr writes:
> Samuel Wales writes on Tue 28 Jun 2022 16:23:
>
> > [inactive timestamps] much better than date trees for my case.
>
> Reading this, I tried to find out what a date tree is.
>
> The manual says (in 10.1.3.1):
>
>A date tree is an outline structure with
Samuel Wales writes on Tue 28 Jun 2022 16:23:
> [inactive timestamps] much better than date trees for my case.
Reading this, I tried to find out what a date tree is.
The manual says (in 10.1.3.1):
A date tree is an outline structure with years on the highest
level, months or ISO weeks
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>>> https://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-Links.html#FOOT28
>>
>> Unless I miss something, this footnote is plain wrong. The timestamps
>> are not removed. At least not when I run M-x org-store-link on a
>> headline with timestamp with emacs -Q.
>
Ihor Radchenko writes:
>> https://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-Links.html#FOOT28
>
> Unless I miss something, this footnote is plain wrong. The timestamps
> are not removed. At least not when I run M-x org-store-link on a
> headline with timestamp with emacs -Q.
I think we should just remove
Ypo writes:
> I found it again:
>
> "If the headline contains a timestamp, it is removed from the link,
> which results in a wrong link—you should avoid putting a timestamp in
> the headline."
>
> https://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-Links.html#FOOT28
Unless I miss something, this footnote is
G [2021-06-28 Mon 15:44] klingons said garbage scow
On 6/28/22, Ypo wrote:
>/I think I've read somewhere that it is a "bad practice" to use dates in/
>/headlines, is it correct? I haven't found it in the manual./
>
>/Like:/
>
>/ <2022-06-29 mi. 10:30> Meeting
Thanks, Jean and Samuel, I will keep using them without remorse then :-)
Best regards!
El 28/06/2022 a las 23:13, Jean Louis escribió:
> On 2022-06-28 12:06, Ypo wrote:
>> I think I've read somewhere that it is a "bad practice" to use dates
>> in headlines, is it
:44] klingons said garbage scow
On 6/28/22, Ypo wrote:
> I think I've read somewhere that it is a "bad practice" to use dates in
> headlines, is it correct? I haven't found it in the manual.
>
> Like:
>
> <2022-06-29 mi. 10:30> Meeting
>
> Best re
On 2022-06-28 12:06, Ypo wrote:
I think I've read somewhere that it is a "bad practice" to use dates
in headlines, is it correct? I haven't found it in the manual.
Like:
<2022-06-29 mi. 10:30> Meeting
Best regards
In many of my notes I use dates in titles of the sectio
I think I've read somewhere that it is a "bad practice" to use dates in
headlines, is it correct? I haven't found it in the manual.
Like:
<2022-06-29 mi. 10:30> Meeting
Best regards
15 matches
Mail list logo
