ah, I failed to mention my version number -- 9.6.15 (which ships with Emacs
29.3).
If it's complete in the latest version, then that's great -- I can wait for
the future to come to me.
Peter
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:43 AM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Peter Mao writes:
>
> > The docstrings for org
Peter Mao writes:
> The docstrings for org-metadown and org-metaup (and maybe other
> context-dependent commands) should reference the corresponding hooks,
> org-metadown-hook and org-metaup-hook.
But they do?
org-metadown is an interactive and natively compiled function defined
in org-
The docstrings for org-metadown and org-metaup (and maybe other
context-dependent commands) should reference the corresponding hooks,
org-metadown-hook and org-metaup-hook.
I recently ran into the (happy) situation where M- popped me from an
org-babel code block into the corresponding session, but
I do not know how these are intended to behave and tests are showing
inconsistent results.
It might help if these explained whether timestamp, ts, and tsia up
and down refer to untagged timestamps only, or all timestamps
including deadline, scheduled, and closed.
It might also help to explain whi
Hi,
On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
Hi,
I've been poking about trying to understand org-date tree, as It is
essentially an undocumented feature at the moment. am i right in my
understanding that it is only meant as a refile-target structure?
The feature request is to allow
"Tim O'Callaghan" writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've been poking about trying to understand org-date tree, as It is
> essentially an undocumented feature at the moment. am i right in my
> understanding that it is only meant as a refile-target structure?
>
> The feature request is to allow the use of ISO week
Hi,
I've been poking about trying to understand org-date tree, as It is
essentially an undocumented feature at the moment. am i right in my
understanding that it is only meant as a refile-target structure?
The feature request is to allow the use of ISO week numbers to
structure the year rather th
Hi Adam and all others
From time to time my emails don't reach the list. Maybe I made a
mistake and sent my answer to Adam personally this afternoon.
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your request is right on the money; in fact Bastien's already ahead of
> you -
>
> http://search.gmane.
Hi Adam and all others
From time to time my emails don't reach the list. Maybe I made a
mistake and sent my answer to Adam personally this afternoon.
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your request is right on the money; in fact Bastien's already ahead of
> you -
>
> http://search.gmane.
On Jan 20, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
Sorry if Ive sounded grumpy. When I saw the mail talking of the
need to rewrite org-mode
Just to be sure - I was not really serious in a practical way. No
rewrite in sight.
Very unlikely to happen.
- Carsten
__
On Jan 19, 2008 10:44 PM, Sven Bretfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to all
>
> Org mode is powerful. This well-known, almost trivial, statement
> contains a problematic dimension that is so far not solved in neither
> the documentation nor in the various howtos all over the web: How do
> ne
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 06:14:40PM +0100, Sven Bretfeld wrote:
> Hello to all
>
> Org mode is powerful. This well-known, almost trivial, statement
> contains a problematic dimension that is so far not solved in neither
> the documentation nor in the various howtos all over the web: How do
> newbie
Hello to all
Org mode is powerful. This well-known, almost trivial, statement
contains a problematic dimension that is so far not solved in neither
the documentation nor in the various howtos all over the web: How do
newbies learn to make optimal use of all it's power?
I read quite a few descript
13 matches
Mail list logo
