Bastien writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Abrahamsen writes:
>
>> I ended up writing a function on top of that that does find-or-create,
>> so you can go to a certain outline path, creating and inserting
>> (optionally in sorted order) the missing segments as you go. It was
>> fairly difficult to get
Hi Eric,
Eric Abrahamsen writes:
> I ended up writing a function on top of that that does find-or-create,
> so you can go to a certain outline path, creating and inserting
> (optionally in sorted order) the missing segments as you go. It was
> fairly difficult to get right, so perhaps it will be
Bastien writes:
> Hi Adam,
>
> Adam Porter writes:
>
>> While working on org-recent-headings, I thought I needed a version of
>> org-find-olp that behaved slightly differently, so I wrote a new
>> function.
>
> thanks for working on such improvements. Is there something here we
> can integrate
Hi Adam,
Adam Porter writes:
> While working on org-recent-headings, I thought I needed a version of
> org-find-olp that behaved slightly differently, so I wrote a new
> function.
thanks for working on such improvements. Is there something here we
can integrate in Org (master)? If possible, l
I see that using an "inline" attachment was a bad idea. At least, the
lists.gnu.org Web UI wraps the lines. Here it is as an "attachment"
attachment, in case that helps.
#+BEGIN_SRC elisp :results silent
(defun org-olp-marker (olp &optional this-buffer unique)
"Return a marker pointing to
Hi,
While working on org-recent-headings, I thought I needed a version of
org-find-olp that behaved slightly differently, so I wrote a new
function. It turned out that I didn't need the new function, but I
found that it seems to be much faster than org-find-olp, so it might be
worth using in Org.
