unable to follow this but it sounds like a big deal and i am glad that
you are looking into it. thanks.
[my use case fwiw:
1] it is disruptive for me having org-capture not work [i do not alwys use kb].
2] x-wide capture using emacsclient would presumably not contain the
page title in firefox.
3]
Max Nikulin writes:
To summarize, I believe that a browser extension is a safer way to use
> org-protocol. With a native messaging helper application it is even
> possible to avoid desktop-wide org-protocol configuration and to call
> emacsclient directly by the add-on but not through links o
On 29/01/2023 20:50, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
On 26/01/2023 01:01, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678994
Bug 1678994 "website permission to open special links in external
applications not configurable"
...
It appears to be a newer versio
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 26/01/2023 01:01, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678994
>
> Bug 1678994 "website permission to open special links in external
> applications not configurable"
>
> Ihor, do you know any details concerning the affected add-on? It see
On 26/01/2023 01:01, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1678994
Bug 1678994 "website permission to open special links in external
applications not configurable"
Ihor, do you know any details concerning the affected add-on? It seems
in LinkRemark I managed to
