Hi Kisaragi Hiu,
> Done; I haven't done the copyright assignment paperwork with FSF, but
> I guess it's fine since this is under the 15 line limit?
Yes, thanks a lot. I've applied your commits to th master branch. I
just added the TINYCHANGE cookie in the commit messages.
> I copied a few exam
Done; I haven't done the copyright assignment paperwork with FSF, but I guess
it's fine since this is under the 15 line limit?
I copied a few examples from org-duration.el, which is what actually defines
the format (org-refresh-effort-estimates). I also corrected the docstring of
org-effort-pro
Hi Kisaragi Hiu,
Kisaragi Hiu writes:
> Currently, the Info node about effort estimates does not mention what
> format should it be written in. This causes confusion, as a user might
> assume that it's the same format as schedulers (10m, 6h, etc.) like I
> did.
>
> Simply mentioning "Effort esti
Hi Jean-Christophe,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I'm not sure would be pertinent to create a whole section for duration
> format: these are not quite as ubiquitous as timestamps. However, they
> are used here and there so it may be better to add a few words in the
> appropriate sections, the main o
Hello,
Jean-Christophe Helary
writes:
>> On Jan 4, 2020, at 14:20, Kisaragi Hiu wrote:
>>
>> It didn't work for me because I gave it "10m" which actually means 10
>> months, I've realized.
>>
>> Still, Durations as defined by org-duration.el should be described in the
>> manual like how Tim
> On Jan 4, 2020, at 14:20, Kisaragi Hiu wrote:
>
> It didn't work for me because I gave it "10m" which actually means 10 months,
> I've realized.
>
> Still, Durations as defined by org-duration.el should be described in the
> manual like how Timestamps are.
This does look like a potential
It didn't work for me because I gave it "10m" which actually means 10 months,
I've realized.
Still, Durations as defined by org-duration.el should be described in the
manual like how Timestamps are.
2020年1月4日 11:55 差出し人： k...@kyleam.com:
> Kisaragi Hiu writes:
>
>> Currently, the Info node ab
Kisaragi Hiu writes:
> Currently, the Info node about effort estimates does not mention what
> format should it be written in. This causes confusion, as a user might
> assume that it's the same format as schedulers (10m, 6h, etc.) like I
> did.
>
> Simply mentioning "Effort estimates need to have
Currently, the Info node about effort estimates does not mention what
format should it be written in. This causes confusion, as a user might
assume that it's the same format as schedulers (10m, 6h, etc.) like I
did.
Simply mentioning "Effort estimates need to have the format H:MM"
(copied from the
