Trailing whitespace after export snippets without a transcoder (was: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments)

2024-04-20 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> +#+begin_src org >> +The following line may become a patagraph separator. >> +@@comment: might give unexpected effect @@ >> +Put some text before @@comment: a better variant >> +@@ and after instread. >> +#+end_src >> >> I am no longer able to repro

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2024-04-17 Thread Max Nikulin
On 15/04/2024 19:17, Ihor Radchenko wrote: +#+begin_src org +The following line may become a patagraph separator. +@@comment: might give unexpected effect @@ +Put some text before @@comment: a better variant +@@ and after instread. +#+end_src I am no longer able to reproduce the problem with

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2024-04-15 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: +#+begin_src org +The following line may become a patagraph separator. +@@comment: might give unexpected effect @@ +Put some text before @@comment: a better variant +@@ and after instread. +#+end_src >>> >>> May you please elaborate? >>> If yo

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-09-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: > On 08/07/2023 16:31, Ihor Radchenko wrote: - it is what we use ourselves in WORG sources. > >> Max Nikulin writes: >>> I have not found it in the worg repository. There are enough @@html:@@ >>> with a handful of @@latex:@@. >> >> Yeah, not in WORG. >> https://orgmode.o

Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-08-06 Thread Bastien Guerry
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Max Nikulin writes: > >>> The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog, >> >> A blog with a couple of posts a year has a little sense. Moreover it is >> closer to a wiki article because it is supposed to be updated. That is >> why I asked for an

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-10 Thread Max Nikulin
On 08/07/2023 16:31, Ihor Radchenko wrote: - it is what we use ourselves in WORG sources. Max Nikulin writes: I have not found it in the worg repository. There are enough @@html:@@ with a handful of @@latex:@@. Yeah, not in WORG. https://orgmode.org/quickstart.html#text-comments It makes

Re: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-08 Thread Ihor Radchenko
n WORG sources. > > I have not found it in the worg repository. There are enough @@html:@@ > with a handful of @@latex:@@. Yeah, not in WORG. https://orgmode.org/quickstart.html#text-comments > +** Is it possible to add inline comments? > +:PROPERTIES: > +:CUSTOM_ID: inlin

[PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-07 Thread Max Nikulin
Subject: [PATCH v2] org-faq.org: Inline comments * org-faq.org (Export): New heading describing workarounds for inline comments. --- org-faq.org | 32 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) diff --git a/org-faq.org b/org-faq.org index ab661395..42cd2ef4 100644 --- a/org

Org FAQ design (Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments)

2023-07-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 01/07/2023 22:24, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Max Nikulin writes: FAQ is probably fine. We may add a CSS there that will fold the answers by default. When all entries are opened, it is possible to use search in browser. I am against the idea of hiding answers. However the table of contents, that

Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> FAQ is probably fine. We may add a CSS there that will fold the >> answers by default. > > When all entries are opened, it is possible to use search in browser. I > am against the idea of hiding answers. However the table of contents, > that is rather long and revealed on

Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-07-01 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog, > > A blog with a couple of posts a year has a little sense. Moreover it is > closer to a wiki article because it is supposed to be updated. That is > why I asked for an alternative location on Worg for

Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-06-30 Thread Max Nikulin
On 29/06/2023 17:47, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Max Nikulin writes: I think, it is time to add a FAQ entry, see the attachment. The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog, A blog with a couple of posts a year has a little sense. Moreover it is closer to a wiki article

Re: [PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-06-29 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >>> Could it be possible to make inline comments (# something like this) ? > ... >> Previous discussion: > ... > > I think, it is time to add a FAQ entry, see the attachment. The proposed FAQ entry is overwhelming. It would work fine as a blog, but

[PATCH] org-faq.org: Inline comments

2023-06-28 Thread Max Nikulin
On 22/06/2023 08:50, Max Nikulin wrote: On 22/06/2023 07:04, ypuntot wrote: Could it be possible to make inline comments (# something like this) ? ... Previous discussion: ... I think, it is time to add a FAQ entry, see the attachment. To my taste FAQ is rather long already. If you have

Re: Inline comments

2023-06-21 Thread Max Nikulin
On 22/06/2023 07:04, ypuntot wrote: Could it be possible to make inline comments (# something like this) ? I found this, but it doesn't seem to world, or I misused it. https://gist.github.com/andersjohansson/6baa1e42ad4d7353e125 Unfortunately the only native comments that Org has are

Inline comments

2023-06-21 Thread ypuntot
Hi Could it be possible to make inline comments (# something like this) ? I found this, but it doesn't seem to world, or I misused it. https://gist.github.com/andersjohansson/6baa1e42ad4d7353e125 Best regards