Hello,
"James R Miller" writes:
> This just might be the functionality that makes me learn elisp. :)
See. You'll soon thank me for removing the feature you liked ;)
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
This just might be the functionality that makes me learn elisp. :)
--
James Miller
james.ryland.mil...@gmail.com
"James R Miller" writes:
> It just seems like a regression to me instead of a fix. Functionality
> was removed instead of fixed.
I am not sure about how helpful your message is.
I am not opposed to the fancy indentation you want: if you want to fix
it properly, you can give it a go. The code
It just seems like a regression to me instead of a fix. Functionality was
removed instead of fixed.
--
James Miller
james.ryland.mil...@gmail.com
Hello,
"James R Miller" writes:
> Was there really not a way to keep fancy description list indentation
> instead of removing it entirely?
I don't know if there is a way, but the implementation did not work with
nested lists.
> I have almost a decade of org files
> that use description lists,
> James R Miller writes:
> Hi all, Was there really not a way to keep fancy description list
> indentation instead of removing it entirely? I have almost a
> decade of org files that use description lists, and it really
> helps have the description items called out from the
Hi all,
Was there really not a way to keep fancy description list indentation instead
of removing it entirely? I have almost a decade of org files that use
description lists, and it really helps have the description items called out
from the description text.
Is there a simple way to add
