Hi Karl and Timothy,
thank you Karl for reviving this important topic.
I think our collective priority should be to work on
https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-synxtax.html so that it reflects the
current Org syntax. Hopefully we can do this before Org 9.6. As
discussed with TEC, we can factor out
Hi Timothy,
* Timothy wrote:
> --=-=-=
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Off topic: Something's quite off here with the encoding at least at
my side (using slrn). I might be related to my setup, can't tell at
the
Hi Bastien,
* Bastien wrote:
> Hi Karl and Timothy,
>
> thank you Karl for reviving this important topic.
>
> I think our collective priority should be to work on
> https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-synxtax.html so that it reflects the
> current Org syntax. Hopefully we can do this before Org 9.6
Karl Voit writes:
> I tried to collect projects on
> https://gitlab.com/publicvoit/orgdown/-/blob/master/doc/Tool-Support.org
Would you be interested to contribute to https://orgmode.org/tools.html?
>> Perhaps TEC is right and we will end up having the minimal syntax
>> being the one we current
Hi,
* TEC wrote:
>
> I'm still hoping for that discussion :P
>
> To the Org community, if you have thoughts on this - please share them
> :)
For reasons explained in my Orgdown-related articles[1] I would
propose to use this chance to introduce a different term for the
Org-mode lightweight marku
Karl Voit writes:
> For reasons explained in my Orgdown-related articles[1] I would
> propose to use this chance to introduce a different term for the
> Org-mode lightweight markup language in contrast to the Org-mode
> Elisp implementation in order to push the syntax in a tool-agnostic
> way. We
