Matt Huszagh writes:
I couldn't get ~org--match-text-baseline-ascent~ to compute the
ascent : the ~xml-get-attribute~ call returns
: ("-16.945024" "12.153473" "16.148855" "8.064997")
which gives an ascent < -100, and the code then defaults to 'center.
I'd need to know more about your setup fo
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> This looks great indeed but I've failed to reproduce in my
> environment.
Thanks for testing this Sébastien.
> I couldn't get ~org--match-text-baseline-ascent~ to compute the
> ascent : the ~xml-get-attribute~ call returns
> : ("-16.945024" "12.153473" "16.148855" "
Hi,
Matt Huszagh writes:
I feel that maybe it would be useful to attach screenshots to show the
improvement from this patch? Anyway, I've attached two images: one with
the correct baseline alignment to surrounding text and the other with
the current, incorrect, baseline alignment.
I think a lot
Timothy, looping you in on this.
I feel that maybe it would be useful to attach screenshots to show the
improvement from this patch? Anyway, I've attached two images: one with
the correct baseline alignment to surrounding text and the other with
the current, incorrect, baseline alignment.
I think
Matt Huszagh writes:
> I've created a patch to align the baseline of latex image fragments to
> the surrounding text. The patch consists of several parts. First, it
> adds a customizable variable that can be set to a user supplied function
> to compute the value of :ascent passed to `overlay-put'
Hello,
I've created a patch to align the baseline of latex image fragments to
the surrounding text. The patch consists of several parts. First, it
adds a customizable variable that can be set to a user supplied function
to compute the value of :ascent passed to `overlay-put'. It can also be
set to