Re: Problem in 9.3: (next-error) broken

2020-08-29 Thread Kyle Meyer
Tory S. Anderson writes: > In any case, I keep having org-occur-next-match set away from nil, and > I'm actually having trouble figuring out which hook will fix it, since > org-mode-hook doesn't seem to be doing it. Instead I end up manually > evaluating =(setq next-error-function nil)= every

Re: Problem in 9.3: (next-error) broken

2020-08-29 Thread Tory S. Anderson
Perhaps I was on an old version, although I don't think it was that old. In any case, I keep having org-occur-next-match set away from nil, and I'm actually having trouble figuring out which hook will fix it, since org-mode-hook doesn't seem to be doing it. Instead I end up manually evaluating

Re: Problem in 9.3: (next-error) broken

2020-08-29 Thread Kyle Meyer
Tory S. Anderson writes: > I discovered teh cause of this error is that new versions of orgmode > sets next-error-function and so breaks the. I've added a hook to clear > this in orgmode and I can navigate my grep properly again. I'm not having any luck triggering the issue, but in any case

Re: Problem in 9.3: (next-error) broken

2020-08-24 Thread Tory S. Anderson
I discovered teh cause of this error is that new versions of orgmode sets next-error-function and so breaks the. I've added a hook to clear this in orgmode and I can navigate my grep properly again. "Tory S. Anderson" writes: > Running 9.3 as included in emacs 27, I have found a breaking

Problem in 9.3: (next-error) broken

2020-08-22 Thread Tory S. Anderson
Running 9.3 as included in emacs 27, I have found a breaking error that I am not sure how to debug any further. Here's my workflow: 1 or 2. Execute (find-grep) for something that brings results 1 or 2. Switch to an orgmode buffer 3. Attempt C-` (next-error) Result: user-error: No more matches