Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow passing post-process to org-publish-org-to for use by org-export-to

2014-02-12 Thread Erik Hetzner
At Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:55:52 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Not really. If you look at `org-latex-publish-to-pdf' you will see that > publishing is done differently: the binary file is generated, then > published as an attachment. Hi Nicolas, Thanks so much for your help. This looks like exac

Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow passing post-process to org-publish-org-to for use by org-export-to

2014-02-12 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Erik Hetzner writes: > Thanks very much for your response (and ox.el)! I looked at filters, > but concluded they were not appropriate, because pandoc operates on > the file as a whole, and writes to a file, and can return binary > content (for example, if it is generating PDFs). Then you're cor

Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow passing post-process to org-publish-org-to for use by org-export-to

2014-02-12 Thread Erik Hetzner
At Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:02:12 +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > Erik Hetzner writes: > > > I have been looking at publishing to HTML using pandoc. Because pandoc > > requires post-processing to transform the org-mode markdown output to > > other formats, it is necessary to use the pos

Re: [O] [PATCH] Allow passing post-process to org-publish-org-to for use by org-export-to

2014-02-12 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Erik Hetzner writes: > I have been looking at publishing to HTML using pandoc. Because pandoc > requires post-processing to transform the org-mode markdown output to > other formats, it is necessary to use the post-process parameter of > org-export-to-file. > I think this patch makes se