Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful

2013-02-26 Thread Bastien
Hi François, François Pinard writes: > P.S. About an option to sort the previous way, that is, by the physical > contents of the line, visible or not, I do not have a use case for it, I > would not need such an option. > > I sometimes, yet not often, need to group together links by their > origi

Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful

2013-02-25 Thread François Pinard
Bastien writes: > [1] http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=30d6dc > [2] http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=662cb9 While your commits are rather small, I would likely never have figured out how to do them, the magic goes over my head. It's a little like playing go

Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful

2013-02-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 25 feb. 2013, at 10:28, Bastien wrote: > Hi François, > > sorting list items and headlines is now done against the visible > part of the item and headlines, i.e., it ignores hidden links and > emphasis markers. Hi Bastien, are you sure it removes emphasis markers as well? Looks to me that

Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful

2013-02-25 Thread Bastien
Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik writes: > are you sure it removes emphasis markers as well? Looks to me that > org-sort-remove-invisible only removes links. I guess it could be > rewritten looking at invisibility properties, but that might be problematic > when sorting includes a part of the buffe

Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful

2013-02-25 Thread Bastien
Hi François, sorting list items and headlines is now done against the visible part of the item and headlines, i.e., it ignores hidden links and emphasis markers. I am not sure it is useful to add a parameter to `org-sort-list' and `org-sort-entries' to let the user change this default behavior: d

Re: [O] C-c ^ not fully useful

2013-02-21 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 02:36:57PM -0500, François Pinard wrote: > > - Could org-sort, by default and for most of its current option letters, > sort alphabetically (or lexicographically as they say!) over the > visual aspect of the line instead of its physical contents? It might > be diffic