Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-15 Thread Jacek Generowicz
At Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:25:47 +0100, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: > > Hi Jos'h, > > have you looked at the :session header argument? I use it to define > environment variables in bash that are used in later code blocks. > > Something like this: > > #+BEGIN_SRC sh :session foo > export W="world." > #+

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Jos'h, have you looked at the :session header argument? I use it to define environment variables in bash that are used in later code blocks. Something like this: #+BEGIN_SRC sh :session foo export W="world." #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: #+BEGIN_SRC sh :session foo echo Hello $W #+END_SRC If these

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Eric Schulte
Jos'h Fuller writes: > Hi! > >> Yes, although it seems that the existing "no-export" or "strip-export" >> options to the :noweb header argument may better suit your purposes. >> These are described in the Org-mode manual, however, they are not >> mentioned in the online version of the manual whic

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Jos'h Fuller
Hi! > Yes, although it seems that the existing "no-export" or "strip-export" > options to the :noweb header argument may better suit your purposes. > These are described in the Org-mode manual, however, they are not > mentioned in the online version of the manual which is out of date. I thought I

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Eric Schulte
Jos'h Fuller writes: > Hi! > >> > It seems like I almost need some variant of the "tangle" argument to >> > :noweb where syntax references are expanded for evaluation, but not >> > for anything else. >> > >> >> Why would you want to tangle out a python src file with an un-expanded >> noweb refer

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Jos'h Fuller
Hi! > > It seems like I almost need some variant of the "tangle" argument to > > :noweb where syntax references are expanded for evaluation, but not > > for anything else. > > > > Why would you want to tangle out a python src file with an un-expanded > noweb reference? Either way, who am I to ju

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Eric Schulte
Jos'h Fuller writes: > Hi! > >> Does the :no-expand header argument do what you want? See >> http://orgmode.org/manual/no_002dexpand.html#no_002dexpand. > > I tried using it like this: > > #+name: function-demo > #+begin_src python :exports both :noweb yes :results output :no-expand > <>

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Jos'h Fuller
Hi! > Does the :no-expand header argument do what you want? See > http://orgmode.org/manual/no_002dexpand.html#no_002dexpand. I tried using it like this: #+name: function-demo #+begin_src python :exports both :noweb yes :results output :no-expand <> print entable([["One", 2, 59

Re: [O] Tangling without clutter?

2012-03-14 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Jos'h Fuller writes: > Hi! > > I was writing some documentation about how to use a Python function, so I > decided to try the tangling feature. However, the result, when exported to > PDF, is unsatisfactory because the referenced code block is included twice -- > first in the original location