Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-17 Thread Edward John Steere
>> Which CEDET features would we want to use from core? > > For one, I'd like to see more major modes come with support for Semantic > right in the major mode's own definition (rather than have it part of > CEDET). E.g. for Elisp mode, CC-mode, ... > > The idea is to get to the point where

Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-17 Thread Eric Ludlam
On 02/12/2017 11:00 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: On 12.02.2017 05:33, Stefan Monnier wrote: I don't have anything against supporting Semantic more widely, but we should understand that it isn't something all users want. And the "Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based

Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-14 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> "Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based >> background process solutions) is unlikely to go away. > While I haven't had time to work on CEDET lately, I'd be happy to discuss > specific performance issues and share ideas on how to improve them, > presumably after

Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-12 Thread Dmitry Gutov
On 12.02.2017 05:33, Stefan Monnier wrote: We don't have enough infrastructure support in general for "advanced" editing functionality such as type/scope-aware completion. So we have various add-on thingies (like company-mode, cedet, and auto-complete) which provide such support for specific

Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-11 Thread Stefan Monnier
SM> For one, I'd like to see more major modes come with support for Semantic SM> right in the major mode's own definition (rather than have it part of SM> CEDET). E.g. for Elisp mode, CC-mode, ... SM> The idea is to get to the point where Semantic support is just another SM> thing that a major

Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-11 Thread John Wiegley
> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes: SM> For one, I'd like to see more major modes come with support for Semantic SM> right in the major mode's own definition (rather than have it part of SM> CEDET). E.g. for Elisp mode, CC-mode, ... SM> The idea is to get to the point

Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-02 Thread Stefan Monnier
SM> 2- We wanted to integrate it more tightly with Emacs (not in terms of SM> bug-tracking and releasing schedule, but in terms of making it SM> possible for generic Emacs code to use some of CEDET, and to SM> encourage more major modes and other features to use CEDET). > Can you clarify what the