Jean Louis writes:
> In my opinion, it's not that Org was intentionally designed to be
> "lightweight markup readable for humans"; rather, it was maintained in
> a manner that focused on preserving its readability and prevented it
> from evolving into something less comprehensible.
The point of
Jean Louis writes:
> It's primary use was for Emacs users to make notes, TODO tasks,
> etc. It is secondary that it became leightweight markup language that
> can export to various documents.
IMHO it has always been a _lightweight markup language_, used for
notes and TODO tasks, then soon enough
* Thomas S. Dye [2024-01-02 08:39]:
> Aloha Ihor,
>
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> > @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ ** Summary
> > It relies on a lightweight plain-text markup language used in files
> > with the =.org= extension.
> > +Org files can be viewed using any text editor. You can read and
> >
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 16:22:00 +0100 Ihor Radchenko wrote ---
>
> I'd like to amend the Org manual introduction as in the attached patch.
> The idea is to highlight that Org markup is designed to be
> human-readable first and foremost rather than just computer-readable.
>
> This is the
Aloha Ihor,
Ihor Radchenko writes:
@@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ ** Summary
It relies on a lightweight plain-text markup language used in
files
with the =.org= extension.
+Org files can be viewed using any text editor. You can read
and
+understand raw Org markup with a naked eye. Although autho
