Jens Schmidt writes:
>> Backward compatibility will be easy - just leave the current code when
>> old query version is detected. We should better focus on the new syntax
>> in future and leave the current syntax as compatibility layer that will
>> be eventually deprecated.
>
> Agreed except for
On 2023-09-02 09:10, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Jens Schmidt writes:
>> This all calls for a proper parser, based on peg or bovine or whatever.
>> Hopefully that parser would still keep backward compatibility, but
>> that's probably wishful thinking.
>
> Backward compatibility will be easy - just
