Hello,
Matt Huszagh writes:
> My vote goes for keeping the newlines to improve readability in the
> generated tex file. But, again, I'm more than happy to be overuled.
[...]
> I've attached an updated patch.
Applied. Thank you.
I added TINYCHANGE at the end of the commit message since I
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> So, has anyone settled on which one to apply?
My vote goes for keeping the newlines to improve readability in the
generated tex file. But, again, I'm more than happy to be overuled.
> Minor nitpick:
>
> (if (string-suffix-p string "\n") ...)
>
> is slightly less
Hello,
Matt Huszagh writes:
> Thanks for the reply Eric. The thing I like about the newlines is that the
> generated tex files are slightly easier to read. However, this is really
> minor. I've created 2 separate patches: one keeping the newlines and the
> other without. I'm happy to defer to
Thanks for the reply Eric. The thing I like about the newlines is that the
generated tex files are slightly easier to read. However, this is really
minor. I've created 2 separate patches: one keeping the newlines and the
other without. I'm happy to defer to you or anyone else in regard to which
is
Not really worried about which alternative is chosen. I was just
exhibiting my inner compulsive nature... ;-)
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50, Org release_9.2.6-544-gd215c3
On Thursday, 5 Dec 2019 at 11:03, Matt Huszagh wrote:
> Is anyone else interested in this modification? Should I submit it as a
> patch?
I think so. And I am not sure all those \n's are necessary. Without
them, you can probably also remove many of the %s.
--
Eric S Fraga via Emacs 27.0.50,
I've modified the behavior of `org-create-formula-image' so that
`\definecolor' etc do not create unnecessary whitespace in the output PDF.
Here's the relevant change:
```
...
;; remove tex \par at end of line
(if (string= (substring string -1 nil) "\n")
(aset string
