Re: Replace Org's C-TAB with C-M-TAB - objection?

2020-06-01 Thread Bastien
Hi all, Bastien writes: > C-TAB in Org is bound to `org-force-cycle-archived' to allow to cycle > through archived subtrees. > > In the Emacs tab-bar mode, it is now bound to `tab-next', which needs > to work globally. > > So Org's binding and tab-bar's one are in conflict, as reported here: >

Re: Replace Org's C-TAB with C-M-TAB - objection?

2020-05-26 Thread Vladimir Nikishkin
I'd rather support this change, as I don't have TAB on my keyboard, I use C-i instead of TAB OTOH, C-M-i , which is essentially M-TAB, and essentially what the changes is supposed to be, if flyspell-auto-correct-word (found in flyspell-mode-map) So, if this change is made, and flyspell is turned

Re: Replace Org's C-TAB with C-M-TAB - objection?

2020-05-24 Thread Joost Kremers
On Sun, May 24 2020, stardiviner wrote: Bastien writes: C-TAB in Org is bound to `org-force-cycle-archived' to allow to cycle through archived subtrees. In the Emacs tab-bar mode, it is now bound to `tab-next', which needs to work globally. So Org's binding and tab-bar's one are in

Re: Replace Org's C-TAB with C-M-TAB - objection?

2020-05-24 Thread stardiviner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Bastien writes: > Hi all, > > C-TAB in Org is bound to `org-force-cycle-archived' to allow to cycle > through archived subtrees. > > In the Emacs tab-bar mode, it is now bound to `tab-next', which needs > to work globally. > > So Org's binding

Replace Org's C-TAB with C-M-TAB - objection?

2020-05-24 Thread Bastien
Hi all, C-TAB in Org is bound to `org-force-cycle-archived' to allow to cycle through archived subtrees. In the Emacs tab-bar mode, it is now bound to `tab-next', which needs to work globally. So Org's binding and tab-bar's one are in conflict, as reported here: