Ihor Radchenko writes:
> I don't think so. We intentionally keep Org mailing list as a single
> place for all the discussions, not just Org development.
> AFAIU, Bastien is firmly into this policy (CCing him in case if I
> misunderstood).
You didn't misunderstood: I firmly believe that we
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> David Masterson writes:
>
>>> Would it help if we change it to
>>>
>>> It is made of numerous .org files from https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg.
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> Perhaps:
>>
>> Follow the link https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg for information (including
>> cloning) on the WORG
David Masterson writes:
>> Would it help if we change it to
>>
>> It is made of numerous .org files from https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg.
>>
>> ?
>
> Perhaps:
>
> Follow the link https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg for information (including
> cloning) on the WORG Git repository at SourceHut
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> David Masterson writes:
>
>> I see no mention of "~bzg/org" in worg-about.
>
> Would it help if we change it to
>
> It is made of numerous .org files from https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg.
>
> ?
Perhaps:
Follow the link https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/worg for information
David Masterson writes:
>> FYI, WORG is listed in "Repositories" right at https://sr.ht/~bzg/org/
>
> I see no mention of "~bzg/org" in worg-about.
> ... I think my lack of
> experience for many years is showing -- I didn't think to click on the
> ~bzg/worg link which would've told me about
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> David Masterson writes:
>
>> In worg-about, it looks like the repo is ~bzg/worg on src.ht, but "worg"
>> doesn't come up in the project search on src.ht (but "org" does). Is
>> the repo hidden (I don't have an account on src.ht yet -- perhaps
>> sourcehut should be
David Masterson writes:
> In worg-about, it looks like the repo is ~bzg/worg on src.ht, but "worg"
> doesn't come up in the project search on src.ht (but "org" does). Is
> the repo hidden (I don't have an account on src.ht yet -- perhaps
> sourcehut should be explained a bit in worg-about).
Corwin Brust writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:16 PM David Masterson wrote:
>>
>> Max Nikulin writes:
>>
>> > On 14/11/2023 15:36, Russell Adams wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged
Russell Adams writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:14:43PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
>> Russell Adams writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
>> >> Just a suggestion (or maybe this is already handled?).
>> >>
>> >> Was thinking I'd like to see an
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:14:43PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
> Russell Adams writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
> >> Just a suggestion (or maybe this is already handled?).
> >>
> >> Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged use-cases for Org
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 8:16 PM David Masterson wrote:
>
> Max Nikulin writes:
>
> > On 14/11/2023 15:36, Russell Adams wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged use-cases for Org that
> >>> could be
Russell Adams writes:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
>> Just a suggestion (or maybe this is already handled?).
>>
>> Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged use-cases for Org that
>> could be searched via tags or regexp. The use-cases should include
Max Nikulin writes:
> On 14/11/2023 15:36, Russell Adams wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
>>>
>>> Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged use-cases for Org that
>>> could be searched via tags or regexp.
> [...]
>> Have you looked at Worg?
>
>
On 14/11/2023 15:36, Russell Adams wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged use-cases for Org that
could be searched via tags or regexp.
[...]
Have you looked at Worg?
Specifically there is
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:09:54PM -0800, David Masterson wrote:
> Just a suggestion (or maybe this is already handled?).
>
> Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged use-cases for Org that
> could be searched via tags or regexp. The use-cases should include a
> description of the
Just a suggestion (or maybe this is already handled?).
Was thinking I'd like to see an archive of tagged use-cases for Org that
could be searched via tags or regexp. The use-cases should include a
description of the problem, a general description of the answer, blocks
of elisp (general code) to
16 matches
Mail list logo
