Re: Thoughts on this ob language generator

2023-01-18 Thread Ihor Radchenko
George Mauer writes: > I had a need the other day to execute some typescript in an org document. > Now I know that there's an ob-typescript package but that doesn't quite > work the way I want and expects typescript to be installed globally (which > runs into a variety of versioning issues). > >

Re: Thoughts on this ob language generator

2023-01-14 Thread George Mauer
Thanks a lot Tim, I really appreciate you responding (as you said, it can be discouraging to not get any response) For the record, I just tried this simple example and it works #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent (create-ob-npx :name "ob-nbb" :language "clojurescript"

Re: Thoughts on this ob language generator

2023-01-14 Thread Tim Cross
George Mauer writes: > I had a need the other day to execute some typescript in an org document. Now > I know that there's an > ob-typescript package but that doesn't quite work the way I want and expects > typescript to be installed > globally (which runs into a variety of versioning issues).

Thoughts on this ob language generator

2023-01-13 Thread George Mauer
I had a need the other day to execute some typescript in an org document. Now I know that there's an ob-typescript package but that doesn't quite work the way I want and expects typescript to be installed globally (which runs into a variety of versioning issues). There is a better option available