Hi Lawrence,
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> I'm looking into Haskell (latest ghci) again on org-mode. This
Sadly enough, we don't have a maintainer for ob-haskell.el.
Would you be willing to become the maintainer?
Of course, you can always hand it over to someone else when
you want to. It is ju
Yes -- and I think I came across this long ago during another attempt and
totally forgot about it. I think I'll write this up on emacs.stackexchange
so others will not have to scrounge around. I'm pursuing this because I
really believe emacs org-mode "reproducible research" is superior to all
other
Well another possible solution is to wrap the code blocks in
:{
xxx
:}
in
(defun org-babel-execute:haskell (body params) -- ob-haskell.el
Immanuel
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:21 PM Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
>
> I see your point, i.e., compiled, multi-file projects are not really meant
> for the REP
I see your point, i.e., compiled, multi-file projects are not really meant
for the REPL-dominant world of org-mode babel. Babel's sweet-spot would be
the interpreted world, the very best probably a Lisp language. Still, the
ability to add code to a running REPL should be possible. As I mentioned,
S
I don't think org-babel is a good fit for compiled languages. If the
idea is to just take 1 snippet,
and "execute" that it means that to have a consistent whole you'd need
to put all the modules of
your program into that snippet (already impossible in Haskell, you can
have only 1 module per file),
I'm looking into Haskell (latest ghci) again on org-mode. This
#+begin_src haskell :results verbatim :exports both
:set +m
doubleSmallNumber x = if x > 100
then x
else x*2
#+end_src
works, but still the :set +m is necessary for it to see the whole. But this
#+begin_src haskell :results verba
