> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 11:48 AM
> From: "Jean Louis"
> To: "Michael Albinus"
> Cc: daniela-s...@gmx.it, bug-gnu-em...@gnu.org, "Org-Mode mailing list"
>
> Subject: Re: org-capture user-error: Abort
>
> * Michael Albinus [2020-12-13 11:25]:
> > Jean Louis writes:
> >
> > Hi Je
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 11:46 AM
> From: "Jean Louis"
> To: "Ihor Radchenko"
> Cc: daniela-s...@gmx.it, bug-gnu-em...@gnu.org, "Org-Mode mailing list"
>
> Subject: Re: org-capture user-error: Abort
>
> * Ihor Radchenko [2020-12-13 11:21]:
> > Jean Louis writes:
> >
> > > * danie
Jean Louis writes:
> * Ihor Radchenko [2020-12-13 07:35]:
>> > What case scenarios would rely
>> > on user quitting capture rather than going ahead with an entry?
>>
>> For example, I have a custom capture function from email. The email is
>> removed from inbox upon capture. However, I would no
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 6:22 AM
> From: "Jean Louis"
> To: daniela-s...@gmx.it
> Cc: 45...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Subject: bug#45212: org-capture user-error: Abort
>
> * daniela-s...@gmx.it [2020-12-12 23:19]:
> > Emacs fires "user-error: Abor
* Ihor Radchenko [2020-12-13 07:35]:
> > What case scenarios would rely
> > on user quitting capture rather than going ahead with an entry?
>
> For example, I have a custom capture function from email. The email is
> removed from inbox upon capture. However, I would not want to proceed
> with rem
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 5:37 AM
> From: "Ihor Radchenko"
> To: daniela-s...@gmx.it
> Cc: 45...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Subject: bug#45212: org-capture user-error: Abort
>
> daniela-s...@gmx.it writes:
>
> > Can't one throw a capture abo
daniela-s...@gmx.it writes:
> Can't one throw a capture abort signal instead?
Sure, that is possible. However, consider a possibility that some
external package wants to detect when capture is aborted. If I was
writing such package, I would need to do something like
(condition-case err
(t ))
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 3:51 AM
> From: "Ihor Radchenko"
> To: daniela-s...@gmx.it, daniela-s...@gmx.it
> Cc: 45...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Subject: bug#45212: org-capture user-error: Abort
>
> daniela-s...@gmx.it writes:
>
> > Why it is inten
daniela-s...@gmx.it writes:
> Why it is intended? The user wanted to abort and Emacs obeyed. (q) is an
> option, the user used it,
> and Emacs should not throw an error at the user.
I guess the intention was throwing signal + showing message to user. The
same could certainly be implemented wit
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:34 AM
> From: daniela-s...@gmx.it
> To: "Ihor Radchenko"
> Cc: 45...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Subject: bug#45212: org-capture user-error: Abort
>
>
>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:07 AM
> > From: &qu
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2020 at 2:07 AM
> From: "Ihor Radchenko"
> To: daniela-s...@gmx.it, 45...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Subject: bug#45212: org-capture user-error: Abort
>
> daniela-s...@gmx.it writes:
>
> > Emacs fires "user-error: Abort" after
11 matches
Mail list logo
