Re: inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5?

2023-02-28 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Subject: [PATCH] org-manual: Clarify that :eval yes obeys > `org-confirm-babel-evaluate' > > * doc/org-manual.org (Limit code block evaluation): Clarify :eval yes > value. Applied, onto bugfix.

Re: inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5?

2023-02-27 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Dan Drake writes: > It seems like ":eval yes" was removed some time ago -- see > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/3570/19526. > > Did that get re-added? It seems like it was replaced by the > org-confirm-babel-evaluate mechanism -- >

inconsistency with :eval yes in orgmode.org and gnu.org manuals for org 9.6, 9.5?

2023-02-26 Thread Dan Drake
The online manuals for 16.5 Evaluating Code Blocks seem inconsistent and include a header argument that seems to no longer be respected. https://orgmode.org/manual/Evaluating-Code-Blocks.html, for version 9.6, right now says you can specify a header argument ":eval yes" on source code blocks to