Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-24 Thread Ihor Radchenko
"Tory S. Anderson" writes: > ... But untouched was the type of key-menu I really want to hide when, > for example, I hit =C-c a= =org-agenda= and get a menu of agenda > options to choose from, or =(org-clock-goto '(4))= and I get a big > indexed list of clock items. I don't mind keeping the fast

Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-23 Thread Samuel Wales
[well it does not work on some cmpleting-reads now in 27.1, and melpa seems to be unsigned, so if i am able i have to upgrade a component, try a different ido package perhaps, or try vertico and friends but yes it was a sweet spot.] On 5/23/23, Tory S. Anderson wrote: > Samuel Wales writes:

Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-23 Thread Tory S. Anderson
Ah! Turns out I rely on the Fast completion more than I realized; I am used to hitting "t p" from the agenda to tag an item with a custom status I've created, as you guessed in your message. But untouched was the type of key-menu I really want to hide when, for example, I hit =C-c a= =org-agenda

Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-23 Thread Tory S. Anderson
Samuel Wales writes: > i guess menu selection is a kind of completion and frameworks coud be > used also. a big thing for me that works with ido and ido-hacks and > ido-clever-match is olpath completion for refile-goto and refile. Thank you for the recommendation! I've never tried ido, having g

Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-22 Thread Samuel Wales
i guess menu selection is a kind of completion and frameworks coud be used also. a big thing for me that works with ido and ido-hacks and ido-clever-match is olpath completion for refile-goto and refile. On 5/22/23, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > web...@toryanderson.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes: > >>

Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-22 Thread Ihor Radchenko
web...@toryanderson.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes: > Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its own > way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could instead > have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org would > even ben

Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-21 Thread Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
Tory writes: > Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases.

is it possible to choose a completion engine?

2023-05-20 Thread Tory S. Anderson
Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead. Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there an e