Re: master-->main?

Hi Uwe, On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 17:50, Uwe Brauer wrote: > > Was master «renamed» main, I mean is the default branch now main instead of > master? > As far as I have understood, yes. master branch was renamed to main. Reference: https://list.orgmode.org/87ee9bbpc9@gnu.org/ -- Regards,

master-->main?

Hi I did a git pull and obtained from git://git.sv.gnu.org/emacs/org-mode * [new branch] bugfix -> origin/bugfix dd9105d..fedcb49 emacs-sync -> origin/emacs-sync * [new branch] main -> origin/main * [new tag] release_9.5 -> release_9.5 Your configuration

Re: Org branches: master, main, and maint?

I see that we currently >>> have >>> >>> master >>> main >>> maint >> >> You probably listed your local branch with "git branch -a" or by >> checking your .git/config file. >> >> If you clone a fre

Re: Org branches: master, main, and maint?

On 26/09/2021 17:31, Bastien wrote: Timothy writes: I’ve just had a look at the branches, and I see that we currently have master main maint You probably listed your local branch with "git branch -a" or by checking your .git/config file. If you clone a fresh

Re: Org branches: master, main, and maint?

Hi Bastien, > You probably listed your local branch with “git branch -a” or by > checking your .git/config file. > > If you clone a fresh repo like this: > > ~$ git clone > > and fetch all the branches (git fetch –all) you should only see >

Re: Org branches: master, main, and maint?

Hi Timothy, Timothy writes: > I’ve just had a look at the branches, and I see that we currently > have > > master > main > maint Nope, the official source repository contains - main : the development branch (aka the old "master") - bugfix : the bugfi

Org branches: master, main, and maint?

Hello, I’ve just had a look at the branches, and I see that we currently have ⁃ master ⁃ main ⁃ maint My previous impression was that `master' was the main development branch, and `maint' was for testing (though I wasn’t 100% sure). However now there’s `master', `main', and `maint' I’m feeling