Eric S Fraga writes:
>> Note that I tried to run ediff-buffers on Org buffers and everything
>> remains folded with stable Org 9.5 as well.
>
> That has not been my experience. I think... but cannot verify. I do
> use drawers a lot and differences are often in them for the type of
> document I
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 at 15:25, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> I suspect the same issue. If you try
> M-: (setq org-fold-core-first-unfold-functions nil)
> before doing ediff and it helps, then I will know the culprit.
It doesn't; sorry. With this set to nil, all drawers are closed on
ediff although al
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On a related matter, I typically use vc-ediff for comparing the current
> working copy of a file and the last committed version. This used to
> expand the file completely (assuming I'm remembering correctly) but now
> (some?) drawers are not opened so if there are differen
Hi Ihor,
On Saturday, 7 May 2022 at 13:30, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> While you are at the deadline, feel free to switch org-fold-core-style
> back to overlays.
Thank you. I should have done that (had I thought if it ;-)) but
deadline met in any case. Next time.
> If you get some time and encoun
Eric S Fraga writes:
> I am seeing very strange and somewhat frustrating behaviour with the new
> org-fold implementation. I have not been able to determine the exact
> conditions leading to the problem but some subtrees cannot be revealed
> by either org-cycle or org-fold-reveal and act as if t
Hello all,
I am seeing very strange and somewhat frustrating behaviour with the new
org-fold implementation. I have not been able to determine the exact
conditions leading to the problem but some subtrees cannot be revealed
by either org-cycle or org-fold-reveal and act as if the have no content
