Lele Gaifax writes:
> Hi Ihor,
>
> I had some trouble testing your patches, and the outcome is still unclear to
> me: apparently (again, cannot be sure this is not caused by "improper"
> application of the patches) the new version of org-persist, with default value
> for o-p-remote-files (100),
Hi Ihor,
I had some trouble testing your patches, and the outcome is still unclear to
me: apparently (again, cannot be sure this is not caused by "improper"
application of the patches) the new version of org-persist, with default value
for o-p-remote-files (100), removes any remote file from the p
Lele Gaifax writes:
> I couldn't test yet, but I saw a couple of other glitches, sorry for not
> noticing first.
Thanks for the proof reading.
I updated the patch accordingly.
Best,
Ihor
>From 557e7cec6dd22b09468b82650feed2020f97d781 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <557e7cec6dd22b09468b82
Lele Gaifax writes:
>> + :group 'org-persist
>> + :type '(choice (const :tag "Never" nil)
>> + (const :tag "Always" t)
>> + (number :tag "Keep note more than X files")
>
> Now that you explained the meaning, maybe better to be explicit here,
> mentioning "X remot
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Lele Gaifax writes:
>
>> In the meanwhile, here below some notes:
>
> Thanks! See the updated patch.
Great, you're so fast! :-)
I couldn't test yet, but I saw a couple of other glitches, sorry for not
noticing first.
> ...
> +(defcustom org-persist-remote-files 100
Lele Gaifax writes:
> In the meanwhile, here below some notes:
Thanks! See the updated patch.
Best,
Ihor
>From 92878fab54c26800562409f3c686f065b7523a61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <92878fab54c26800562409f3c686f065b7523a61.1639838789.git.yanta...@gmail.com>
From: Ihor Radchenko
Date:
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Lele Gaifax writes:
>
>>> Maybe we should better make this a user option?
>>
>> Yes, that's what I had in mind: when (say) org-persist-do-not-auto-gc-remotes
>> is enabled, the cleanup procedure would ignore remote Org documents and a new
>> explicit (interactive) org-pe
Lele Gaifax writes:
>> Maybe we should better make this a user option?
>
> Yes, that's what I had in mind: when (say) org-persist-do-not-auto-gc-remotes
> is enabled, the cleanup procedure would ignore remote Org documents and a new
> explicit (interactive) org-persist-gc-remotes would take care
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Lele Gaifax writes:
>
>> I wonder if there is some mechanism I could use to either prevent caching
>> of non-local documents or to avoid the check on existence in the
>> org-persist-gc.
>
> I can easily make a change that always garbage-collect non-local
> documents with
Lele Gaifax writes:
> Digging down, I found that it was due to the persistent cache, that contained
> several entries about remote (Tramp) documents: upon closing Emacs, the
> org-persist-gc function is triggered, and the index is traversed to remove
> dangling entries, performing a file-exist-p
10 matches
Mail list logo
