Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Amy Grinn writes:
>
>> First of all, I would like to change (defalias) the function name
>> org-babel-noweb-wrap to org-babel-noweb-make-regexp. I think this in
>> more in line with other functions which create regular expressions.
>
>
Bastien Guerry writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Bastien, may you check which name is used in the FSF records?
>
> I've taken this offlist.
The name in the FSF records should be correct now.
--
Best,
Amy
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Amy Grinn writes:
>
>> +(insert raw)
>> +(goto-char (point-min))
>> +(while (< (point) (point-max))
>> + (unless (looking-at " *\"\\([^\"]+\\)\" *")
>> +(looki
I would like to update my old contact info in this project.
Best,
Amy
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
new file mode 100644
index 0..0110f4597
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Amy Grinn Tyler Grinn
ot determine
which noweb syntax is being used for any given source file, if
:noweb-wrap was specified in the original Org file.
"""
Best,
Amy
>From 1dc8aebcc45447d3b5b38ea3c7700ae2b2686c9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Amy Grinn
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:05:02 -0400
Subject: [P
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Amy Grinn writes:
>
>> Here is a simple way to implement this feature.
>
> Since you are adding a new feature, it should have (1) test coverage;
> (2) be documented in the manual; (3) be announced in etc/ORG-NEWS.
Thank you for the tips, will do!
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> :noweb yes <<< >>> is actually backwards-incompatible. Consider
> third-party code that makes assumptions about possible values of
> :noweb
> header argument. If third-party code does a check like
> (equal noweb-value "yes"), the new syntax can break such code.
I kinda
Amy Grinn writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Amy Grinn writes:
>>
>>> I would like to add support for setting 'org-babel-noweb-wrap-start and
>>> 'org-babel-noweb-wrap-end for each src block individually
>>
>> May you please explain the use ca
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Amy Grinn writes:
>
>> How much does org mode modify the fontification for an indirect buffer?
>> Without having looked into it, I assume not much or at all.
>> ... I think
>> that approach could be more complex, especially when dealing wi
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Amy Grinn writes:
>
>>>> #+name: firewall
>>>> #+begin_src sh :noweb yes :noweb-start <<< :noweb-end >>>
>>>
>>> May you please explain the use case when changing the default values
>>> is use
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Amy Grinn writes:
>
>> I would like to add support for setting 'org-babel-noweb-wrap-start and
>> 'org-babel-noweb-wrap-end for each src block individually using the
>> header args :noweb-start and :noweb-end:
>> ...
>> #+name: fi
I would like to add support for setting 'org-babel-noweb-wrap-start and
'org-babel-noweb-wrap-end for each src block individually using the
header args :noweb-start and :noweb-end:
#+name: firewall-safe-mode
#+begin_src sh
echo "Firewall is now in safe mode."
#+end_src
#+name: firewall
12 matches
Mail list logo
