On 5/20/2024 3:41 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Jim Porter writes:
+ (when (boundp 'forward-thing-provider-alist)
+(setq-local forward-thing-provider-alist
+(cons '(url . org-next-link)
+ forward-thing-provider-alist)))
According to the docstring,
Jim Porter writes:
>> Ihor, I'll update the Org-mode part of this next and post the new patch
>> for that to the Org list once it's ready.
>
> ... and here's the Org-mode patch for this.
Thanks!
> + (when (boundp 'forward-thing-provider-alist)
> +(setq-local forward-thing-provider-alist
On 5/19/2024 6:34 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
On 5/18/2024 1:26 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I think you can install this now.
Thanks. Merged as ae9045a8bd8.
Ihor, I'll update the Org-mode part of this next and post the new patch
for that to the Org list once it's ready.
... and here's the Org-mode
On 5/18/2024 1:26 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I think you can install this now.
Thanks. Merged as ae9045a8bd8.
Ihor, I'll update the Org-mode part of this next and post the new patch
for that to the Org list once it's ready.
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:27:04 -0700
> Cc: e...@gnu.org, emacs-de...@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter
>
> On 4/30/2024 4:39 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> > What happens if you have multiple providers for an URL?
> > You add the provider to the end, so it will have the lower
H, Drew
Hmmm... thanks for the clarification. That's going to be extremely helpful
once I'm back on track after the "grading season" ;-) All this started, at
least for me, when I was trying to write a simple interactive function to
copy the contents of the cell the point is in to the kill-ring
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 09:10:59 -0700
> Cc: yanta...@posteo.net, emacs-de...@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> From: Jim Porter
>
> On 5/7/2024 5:20 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I disagree. These functions are nowadays the basis of many
> > interactive features, and users are usually mightily
On 5/7/2024 5:20 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I disagree. These functions are nowadays the basis of many
interactive features, and users are usually mightily confused by the
fine print of what "at point" means technically in Emacs. The current
operation is much easier for users to grasp mentally
> > I hear you. The behavior should be changed so
> > that, in general, bounds-of-thing-at-point etc.
> > return nil when there is _no thing at point_,
> > including when point is after, including just
> > after, a thing but not on such a thing.
> >
> > There can be commands (and noncommand fns)
> From: Drew Adams
> CC: "e...@gnu.org" ,
> "emacs-de...@gnu.org"
> ,
> "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org"
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 01:52:13 +
>
> I hear you. The behavior should be changed so
> that, in general, bounds-of-thing-at-point etc.
> return nil when there is _no thing
Thanks for your reply, Jim.
> On 4/30/2024 2:10 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
> >> I've also fixed a bug in EWW and bug-reference-mode
> >> where it would return nil for (thing-at-point 'url)
> >> if point was at the *end* of a URL.
> >
> > By "at the end" I assume you really mean just
> > _after_ a URL,
On 4/30/2024 2:10 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
I've also fixed a bug in EWW and bug-reference-mode
where it would return nil for (thing-at-point 'url)
if point was at the *end* of a URL.
By "at the end" I assume you really mean just
_after_ a URL, i.e., no longer on/at the URL.
FWIW, that's actually
> I've also fixed a bug in EWW and bug-reference-mode
> where it would return nil for (thing-at-point 'url)
> if point was at the *end* of a URL.
By "at the end" I assume you really mean just
_after_ a URL, i.e., no longer on/at the URL.
FWIW, that's actually _superior_ behavior.
Unfortunately
On 4/30/2024 4:39 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
What happens if you have multiple providers for an URL?
You add the provider to the end, so it will have the lower priority in
this scenario. I guess that you want the opposite - EWW provider to take
precedence. Same for other changes.
That's
Jim Porter writes:
> + (setq-local bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist
> + (append bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist
> + '((url . eww--bounds-of-url-at-point
> + (setq-local forward-thing-provider-alist
> + (append
On 4/29/2024 11:14 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Thanks!
I have a small comment on the docstring of
`forward-thing-provider-alist' - it refers to
`thing-at-point-provider-alist', but the provides here are called with
an argument N, unlike the providers in `thing-at-point-provider-alist'.
Fixed.
Jim Porter writes:
> Ihor, Eli: What do you think of the attached patch? I added variables to
> let modes define custom providers for 'bounds-of-thing-at-point' and
> 'forward-thing'. (Notably, I avoided adding vars for the
> 'beginning-of-thing' and 'end-of-thing' functions, since those just
On 4/12/2024 3:30 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
On 4/12/2024 5:41 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Jim Porter writes:
That sounds reasonable enough to me; does anyone else have opinions on
this? Otherwise, I'll get to work on a patch (though probably not for a
couple weeks).
It has been a while since the
On 4/12/2024 5:41 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Jim Porter writes:
That sounds reasonable enough to me; does anyone else have opinions on
this? Otherwise, I'll get to work on a patch (though probably not for a
couple weeks).
It has been a while since the last message in this thread.
Jim, may I
Jim Porter writes:
> On 2/5/2024 7:07 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> It would make sense to add a number of alists:
>> - bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist
>> - same for 'forward-op, 'beginning-op, 'end-op.
>>
>> After Emacs have those, we can add Org mode support.
>
> That sounds reasonable
> From: Ihor Radchenko
> Cc: jporterb...@gmail.com, stefankan...@gmail.com, emacs-de...@gnu.org,
> emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 12:38:19 +
>
> Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > I think we do want to allow extending of this, but doesn't
> > thingatpt.el already provide such
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> I think we do want to allow extending of this, but doesn't
> thingatpt.el already provide such capabilities? For example, I see
> this in bounds-of-thing-at-point:
> ...
> (cond
> ((get thing 'bounds-of-thing-at-point)
> (funcall
> From: Ihor Radchenko
> Cc: emacs-de...@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 22:56:05 +
>
> Jim Porter writes:
>
> > On 2/5/2024 7:07 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> >> It would make sense to add a number of alists:
> >> - bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist
> >> - same
Jim Porter writes:
> On 2/5/2024 7:07 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> It would make sense to add a number of alists:
>> - bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist
>> - same for 'forward-op, 'beginning-op, 'end-op.
>>
>> After Emacs have those, we can add Org mode support.
>
> That sounds reasonable
On 2/5/2024 7:07 AM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
It would make sense to add a number of alists:
- bounds-of-thing-at-point-provider-alist
- same for 'forward-op, 'beginning-op, 'end-op.
After Emacs have those, we can add Org mode support.
That sounds reasonable enough to me; does anyone else have
Jim Porter writes:
>> Looking into the source code of `bounds-of-thing-at-point', I see that
>> for standard "things" (like url),
>> `thing-at-point-bounds-of-url-at-point' is used unconditionally. In the
>> case of Org links, we may have something like [[https://orgmode.org]]
>> that will not
On 11/6/2023 12:11 PM, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
[ Branching to emacs-devel for further input from Emacs devs ]
Jim Porter writes:
This is similar to Emacs bug#66752[1]. It would be nice if
"(thing-at-point 'url)" would return the URL when point is over an Org
link. With this, it's easier to
[ Branching to emacs-devel for further input from Emacs devs ]
Jim Porter writes:
> This is similar to Emacs bug#66752[1]. It would be nice if
> "(thing-at-point 'url)" would return the URL when point is over an Org
> link. With this, it's easier to write a function that copies (or browses
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
