Re: Verbatim content (inline-special-block)

2024-04-12 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> It may be enough to have @kbd{@code{...}} - it is not like Texinfo has a >> concept of truly verbatim text like in Org. >> >> Alternatively, we may allow two classes of inline markup: >> @foo{parsed *text* inside} >> and >> @foo={verbatim *text* inside}/@foo~{verbatim

Re: Verbatim content (inline-special-block)

2024-04-12 Thread Max Nikulin
On 11/04/2024 19:58, Ihor Radchenko wrote: Max Nikulin writes: @code{ unlike =code=, we can have leading and trailing spaces } @code{ @foo{is not interpreted inside}} I think, it should be controlled by some optional parameter like @kbd[:verbatim t]{ unlike =code=, ... }

Re: Verbatim content (inline-special-block)

2024-04-11 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Max Nikulin writes: >> - We should be able to define special markup for code, where the >> contents is not parsed. Something like >> >> @code{ unlike =code=, we can have leading and trailing spaces } >> @code{ @foo{is not interpreted inside}} > > I think, it should be

Verbatim content (inline-special-block)

2024-04-11 Thread Max Nikulin
Ihor Radchenko. Re: Experimental public branch for inline special blocks. Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:52:38 +. https://list.orgmode.org/875xwqj4tl.fsf@localhost - We should be able to define special markup for code, where the contents is not parsed. Something like @code{ unlike