Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?

2005-03-31 Thread Kim F. Storm
Juri Linkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> (defvar next-error-overlay-arrow-position nil) >> (put 'next-error-overlay-arrow-position 'overlay-arrow-string "=>") > > Thanks for the suggestion to put "=>" on the overlay-arrow-string > property. But I wonder why Emacs can't use "=>" by default > on

$B

2005-03-31 Thread info
$B!{!,!,!#(B $B(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,!{(B $B(,(,(,(,(,!{(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(B $B!,!!#o!!!#!!(B $B#o!!(B $B!!(B $B(B $B#o!,!E!D(,!!=P!!2q!!$$!!(BPC$B!!(B $B(,!D!E!!(B $B!!(B $B!{#o!,#o(B $B!!

Re: cursor keys break isearch with null search-exit-option

2005-03-31 Thread Chris Moore
I have no idea. I usually expect Emacs to stop the search if I press a cursor key. But then, I've never had search-exit-option set to anything but t before. One thing I'm sure of, however, is that it shouldn't print an ugly error message, like it currently does. I wasn't aware that setting sear

Re: cursor keys break isearch with null search-exit-option

2005-03-31 Thread Juri Linkov
> If I evaluate this: > > (setq search-exit-option nil) > > then hit C-s (which runs the command isearch-forward) and then press a > cursor key, I see an error: What do you expect Emacs to do when you press cursor keys? Maybe it should call `(isearch-edit-string)' as it does when `search-exit-op

Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?

2005-03-31 Thread Juri Linkov
> I think the motive is quite clear but perhaps it would be too inconvenient. > At the moment Gnus and Edebug use the global value for overlay-arrow-position > which presumably makes debugging Gnus with Edebug a bit awkward. Not only debugging Gnus with Edebug is awkward, but what is worse is debu

Re: why not simpler bindings for help

2005-03-31 Thread Juri Linkov
> 'b' would do for `help-go-back', and doesn't appear to conflict with > anything in help/view mode. > > Also consider adding 'f' for forward I think it's better to make key bindings more similar to Info mode, i.e. `l' to go back, and `r' to go forward. > (requires maintaining a future as well as

Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?

2005-03-31 Thread Juri Linkov
>> I see no problem with the fringe arrow in the compilation buffer, >> because other packages don't try to set their own arrows here, >> so there are no conflicts in the compilation buffer. > > and: > >> Perhaps Edebug should be fixed too in the same way as you fixed GUD? >> Edebug currently uses

Re: Default :group in lisp/emacs-lisp/easy-mmode.el.

2005-03-31 Thread Richard Stallman
The use of custom-current-group seems like a bad practice to me. It is unreliable to make one defun depend on whatever was lying around from a previous defun in this way. It has the result that moving code from one place in a file to another changes its meaning. So I think it would be better to d

Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?

2005-03-31 Thread Richard Stallman
This seems like a good change, but wouldn't it be cleaner to do the add-to-list call be done where next-error-overlay-arrow is defined? As for the next-error arrow, the patch below uses its own arrow for next-error highlighting: Index: lisp/progmodes/compile.el ==

why not simpler bindings for help

2005-03-31 Thread Joe Corneli
, | Help mode: | Major mode for viewing help text and navigating references in it. | Entry to this mode runs the normal hook `help-mode-hook'. | Commands: | key binding | --- --- | | RET help-follow (binding currently shadowed) | C-c Prefix

Notification of Limited Account Access

2005-03-31 Thread PayPal Account Review Department
Title: Untitled Document   As part of our security measures, we regularly screen activity in the PayPal system. We recently noticed the following issue on your account: We recently received a report of unauthorized credit card use associated

cursor keys break isearch with null search-exit-option

2005-03-31 Thread Chris Moore
If I evaluate this: (setq search-exit-option nil) then hit C-s (which runs the command isearch-forward) and then press a cursor key, I see an error: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument integerp right) concat("" [right]) (setq isearch-string (concat isearch-string strin

Re: Ediff frequently crashes emacs.

2005-03-31 Thread Kim F. Storm
Peter Seibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So lately I've been doing a lot of ediffing and this crash is still > biting me from time to time. I'm running a build from the 22nd which, > as far as I recall, I built right after doing a CVS update. > > I do have #if 1 in lisp.h. Here's some GDB output

Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?

2005-03-31 Thread Nick Roberts
> Compilation mode uses local variables but I see that Gnus uses the > global value. It might be a good idea (after the release?) to remove > the variable overlay-arrow-position and initialise > overlay-arrow-variable-list to nil. That way everyone would be forced > to cre

PayPal Notification ( Your account can be suspended )

2005-03-31 Thread support
  Dear PayPal Member, PayPal is committed to maintaining a safe environment for its community of buyers and sellers. To protect the security of your account, PayPal employs some of the most advanced security systems in the world and our anti-fraud teams regularly screen the PayPal system for un

Crash in 2005-03-30 built

2005-03-31 Thread Reiner Steib
Please describe exactly what actions triggered the bug and the precise symptoms of the bug: I got the following crash while Emacs was idle: --8<---cut here---start->8--- (gdb) r -name Gnus -xrm 'Emacs.toolBar:1' -f gnus Starting program: [...]/x86_64/src/emacs

Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?

2005-03-31 Thread Richard Stallman
Compilation mode uses local variables but I see that Gnus uses the global value. It might be a good idea (after the release?) to remove the variable overlay-arrow-position and initialise overlay-arrow-variable-list to nil. That way everyone would be forced to create their own overla

Re: Inherited face appears as a function in customize-face buffer

2005-03-31 Thread Richard Stallman
I made the following patch which seems to work better. WDYT? You changed the code quite a bit, so I can't quickly see what the user-level behavior is. Would you please describe what has changed at that level? ___ Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list Em

auto-fill-mode bug in chinese-gbk coding system [with patchs]

2005-03-31 Thread Zhang Wei
While the coding system is set to chinese-gbk or chinese-gb18030, auto-fill-mode won't work properly. The `nospace-between-words' property does not put on chinese-gbk/chinese-gb18030 charsets properly to eliminate the "extra SPACE" problem when refilling. And the "fill-find-break-point-function

Re: mouse-autoselect-window and menu bar

2005-03-31 Thread Stefan Monnier
> It doesn't bother me this much :-), I've been using > mouse-autoselect-window for a quite a while now and 2 days ago was the > first time, that I noticed this behavior. But then again I'm hardly using > the menu bar (and I've never used the tool bar). That's the problem: with the "select on no-m

Re: emacs losing faces?

2005-03-31 Thread Reiner Steib
On Mon, Feb 14 2005, Robert Marshall wrote: > When I use gnus (which I use to read news) with a recent build of emacs and > then load vm (I use this to read email) and then go back to the news > groups I have lost all the different faces that gnus gives me. > > If I then run list-faces-display -

Re: mouse-autoselect-window and menu bar

2005-03-31 Thread Klaus Zeitler
> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stefan> Stefan> Do you have a suggestion for how to avoid the problem? I think either the window selection should happen once the mouse isn't moved anymore (like Kim suggested, that'd be my choice) or after a short (customizable

Re: Default :group in lisp/emacs-lisp/easy-mmode.el.

2005-03-31 Thread Stefan Monnier
> which is evaluated at compile-time. custom-current-group uses > load-file-name, which is nil at compile-time, so custom-current-group > returns nil at compile-time too. This doesn't seem the intended > behavior. What about the patch below? Looks good, please install, Stefan __

Re: mule-cmds.el defective, make bootfast, makeinfo

2005-03-31 Thread Lute Kamstra
Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am 31.03.2005 um 07:35 schrieb Kenichi Handa: > >> As mule-cmds.el in CVS repository doesn't contain such a >> line as "<<<", it seems that you had a locally modified >> version of mule-cmds.el and "cvs update" couldn't apply a >> new patch because o

Re: mule-cmds.el defective, make bootfast, makeinfo

2005-03-31 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 31.03.2005 um 07:35 schrieb Kenichi Handa: As mule-cmds.el in CVS repository doesn't contain such a line as "<<<", it seems that you had a locally modified version of mule-cmds.el and "cvs update" couldn't apply a new patch because of confliction. If your local modification is not important

Re: obscure new display features

2005-03-31 Thread Miles Bader
On Mar 30, 2005 7:40 AM, Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > I've no idea why non-breaking characters should be displayed like > >> > this, but U+00AD isn't one -- it's SOFT HYPHEN. > > > > I think the same distinction used for NBSP applies: > > Why? It isn't a no-break character. The po

Re: Inherited face appears as a function in customize-face buffer

2005-03-31 Thread David PONCE
Hi, Here is a new simpler patch which works well most of the time. However in some case, when doing M-TAB to complete the face field, I got this error: Debugger entered--Lisp error: (args-out-of-range 1094 1094) get-char-property(1094 field #) widget-field-end(...) widget-field-find(1229)

Default :group in lisp/emacs-lisp/easy-mmode.el.

2005-03-31 Thread Lute Kamstra
In define-minor-mode and easy-mmode-define-global-mode, the default :group value for defcustom calls is calculated by means of (or (custom-current-group) (intern (replace-regexp-in-string "-mode\\'" "" mode-name))) which is evaluated at compile-time. custom-current-grou

Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?

2005-03-31 Thread Nick Roberts
You say (separate e-mails): > I see no problem with the fringe arrow in the compilation buffer, > because other packages don't try to set their own arrows here, > so there are no conflicts in the compilation buffer. and: > Perhaps Edebug should be fixed too in the same way as you fixed GUD? > E