> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:24:34 +, David Reitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> On 13 Nov 2005, at 06:39, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:
>> So, if there's a non-pure object that is only pointed to by pure
>> objects, which may happen if the assumption for the pure storage is
>> violated, the
So, if there's a non-pure object that is only pointed to by pure
objects, which may happen if the assumption for the pure storage is
violated, then the object is reachable but get collected.
Is there evidence that this is in fact happening? If so, can you see
a general rule for
Stefan Monnier writes:
> > *** gdb-ui.el 13 Nov 2005 21:31:16 +1300 1.111
> > --- gdb-ui.el 14 Nov 2005 12:29:46 +1300
> > ***
> > *** 2702,2708
> > (if (re-search-forward address nil t)
> > (gdb-put-breakpoint-icon (eq flag
> *** gdb-ui.el 13 Nov 2005 21:31:16 +1300 1.111
> --- gdb-ui.el 14 Nov 2005 12:29:46 +1300
> ***
> *** 2702,2708
> (if (re-search-forward address nil t)
> (gdb-put-breakpoint-icon (eq flag ?y) bptno
> (if (not (equal gdb
But if you don't have makeinfo the makefile's for man, lispref and lispintro
will fail.
For CVS, you need version 4.2 or later of Texinfo.
Sincerely,
Luc.
___
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
Emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman
But I don't see configure looking for makeinfo
It looks for install-info.
That doesn't seem useful.
If the user doesn't have makeinfo available on their path the make will fail.
so I don't see how this should happen.
It is `make bootstrap' that calls makeinfo, not configure.
But if
But I don't see configure looking for makeinfo
It looks for install-info.
so I don't see how this should happen.
It is `make bootstrap' that calls makeinfo, not configure.
But maybe the following excerpt of INSTALL.CVS is relevant, if you are
using MS Windows:
Users of non-Posix systems
2005/11/14, Juri Linkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>character: € (01235114, 342604, 0x53a4c, U+20AC)
...
> I think it was a good change to use lisp-readable syntax for `M-:',
> so the same syntax should be used for `C-x =' as well.
Yeah...
Is there a lisp syntax for U+20AC?
-miles
--
Do not ta
> C-u C-x = reveals:
>
> character: € (01235114, 342604, 0x53a4c, U+20AC)
=
>
> M-: (read-event) RET € reveals:
>
> 3876 (#o7444, #xf24)
=
BTW, now `C-x =' and `M-:' use different syntax to print the va
> In a buffer starting with ';;; -*- mode: Text; coding: iso-8859-16;
> -*-' (-r: in the mode-line) and holding the characters in the range
> 160-255 i-search for € is not successful:
>
> € = 244 = 164 = A4 = U+20AC = E2 82 AC : EURO SIGN
That's because ISO-8859-15 (Latin-9) is coded inter
I get a "Don't know how to make maintainer-clean" message when I run
`nmake maintainer-clean'. I made the mistake of locating a makefile that
DID know how and it emptied my emacs\info directory. nmake bootstrap
completes successfully but it never rebuilds the info files.
It does rebuild
Hello!
My previous message on this subject was a bit incorrect. Although in
mac/make-package the statements
# Run configure in the new tempparent directory
if test "$with_config" = "yes"; then
(cd ${builddir}; ${srcdir}/configure <"fix" configure's failure with the
I get a "Don't know how to make maintainer-clean" message when I run
`nmake maintainer-clean'. I made the mistake of locating a makefile that
DID know how and it emptied my emacs\info directory. nmake bootstrap
completes successfully but it never rebuilds the info files.
It does rebu
Your Info version of the Elisp manual is not up to date. I guess you ran:
$ ./configure
$ make
$ cd lisp
$ make recompile EMACS=../src/emacs
$ cd ..
$ make
as recommended in INSTALL.CVS.
I thought that `make' automatically updates the Info docs, but I am
not really sure of that. I am su
> The disassembly buffer appears in its own frame as a dedicated window
> with frame focus and Emacs makes this window selected. The cursor is
> at the start of the buffer and Edebug shows that set-window-point
> doesn't move it.
>
> Is the disassembly buffer the current buf
> The example uses negative numbers to prevent impact to existing code.
> Some positive number range will work, as will (symbolp (cdr (syntax-after
> beg))). I've tried all these ways with success. Anything is fine for me.
> I'd like to be able to finally release these modes in working condition
The disassembly buffer appears in its own frame as a dedicated window with
frame focus and Emacs makes this window selected. The cursor is at the
start of the buffer and Edebug shows that set-window-point doesn't move it.
Is the disassembly buffer the current buffer at the time?
Perh
If i choose 'erase customization' in a customization buffer i get the
following message:
widget-apply: Symbol's function definition is void: nil
I can't reproduce that. Would you please provide a
_precise_ test case?
Please read the Bugs section in the Emacs manual, which provides
g
I will fix many of these. I asked others to look at some.
I did not get the warnings from printing.el.
___
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
Emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
But the doc specifically says
...
This is like using `-q' and `--no-site-file', but in addition it
also disables the menu-bar, the tool-bar, the scroll-bars, tool
tips, the blinking cursor, and the fancy startup screen.
That statement is incorrect. Where _exact
On 13 Nov 2005, at 06:39, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:
So, if there's a non-pure object that is only pointed to by pure
objects, which may happen if the assumption for the pure storage is
violated, then the object is reachable but get collected.
OK, that makes sense.
Do you know if this is
>From my earlier reply:
Your Info version of the Elisp manual is not up to date.
I meant:
Your Info version of the Emacs manual is not up to date.
Sincerely,
Luc.
___
Emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
Emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.o
I'm not up to snuff on figuring out where the source is but
the section I quoted starts like this:
C.2 Initial Options
===
The initial options specify parameters for the Emacs session. This
section describes the more general initial options; some other options
While trying to document a bug I ran Emacs using -Q.
It was a nice surprise to see syntax highlighting and paren matching were on.
I've always thought these should default to ON.
But the doc specifically says
...
This is like using `-q' and `--no-site-file', but in addition it
also di
Will any amount of begging get me this show-paren change?
I've now got 4 major modes (tal, tacl, ddl, cobol) supporting language
constructs that can't be described by the limited paren matching ability of
show-paren-function in paren.el.
Currently any given character can only match one specific
While trying to document a bug I ran Emacs using -Q.
It was a nice surprise to see syntax highlighting and paren matching were on.
I've always thought these should default to ON.
But the doc specifically says
...
This is like using `-q' and `--no-site-file', but in addition
Magnus Henoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had opened a file on a remote host over Tramp. The file is in an
> SVN tree. When trying to save the file, I get the following
> backtrace. (I don't have SVN installed on the local machine)
I've tried to reproduce the peoblem locally. `vc-do-comman
27 matches
Mail list logo
