erc: problems with bundled erc in CVS::Emacs

2006-01-31 Thread T. V. Raman
1) For some reason the files in lisp/erc are not getting byte-compiled. 1) Loading library erc bombs because it depends on defalias definitions in erc-compat.el (suggest getting rid of these defalias kluges since they are a nightmare to debug) -- Best Regards, --raman Email: [E

Re: erc: problems with bundled erc in CVS::Emacs

2006-01-31 Thread Luc Teirlinck
T. V. Raman wrote: 1) For some reason the files in lisp/erc are not getting byte-compiled. They do compile for me with: cvs -z3 update -d cd emacs make maintainer-clean ./configure --without-toolkit-scroll-bars make bootstrap 1) Loading library erc bombs because it depends on defali

tramp and RCS files.

2006-01-31 Thread Matt Hodges
In GNU Emacs 22.0.50.17 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.10) of 2006-01-31 on escpc40 X server distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.6090 configured using `configure '--with-gtk'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil

Re: command remapping problem

2006-01-31 Thread Kim F. Storm
"Drew Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 3. Example: emacs -q > > (define-key my-map [remap scroll-up] my-scroll-up) > > The `scroll-up' binding for `C-v' is remapped to `my-scroll-up', but > the `scroll-up' binding for [next] is not remapped to `my-scroll-up'. > > Similarl

Re: strange track-eol and field property interaction

2006-01-31 Thread Richard M. Stallman
It does not fail for me with the latest sources. ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

RE: command remapping problem

2006-01-31 Thread Drew Adams
> If this is the explanation, and this is not simply a bug, > then I guess > that would mean that there is no way to get the behavior of > `substitute-key-definition's OLDMAP argument. What do you mean? That you cannot get OLDMAP behaviour with command remap

Bug in lisp/xml.el

2006-01-31 Thread Ari Roponen
Hi, there seems to be a bug in lisp/xml.el. If I execute the following expression, it fails with error `args-out-of-range': (progn (require 'xml) (with-temp-buffer (insert "first\nsecond\n") (goto-char (point-min)) (forward-line) (let ((buf (current-buffer)) (beg

Re: erc: problems with bundled erc in CVS::Emacs

2006-01-31 Thread T. V. Raman
Well, I'm happy to try a complete clean rebuild --- but I believe I did a make distclean before I built/verified before complaining. > "Luc" == Luc Teirlinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Luc> T. V. Raman wrote: 1) For some reason the files in Luc> lisp/erc are not getting byte-compiled

Re: nil became bound to (# 96536 96288)

2006-01-31 Thread Richard M. Stallman
How much time did you think you needed? Building Emacs out of CVS takes about half an hour on a reasonably fast machine, during which time you do absolutely nothing except wait for it to finish. It's very simple, really. You don't have to do nothing during that time. It can be b

Re: command remapping problem

2006-01-31 Thread Richard M. Stallman
>In that case, we have > lost functionality in going to Emacs 22, because > `substitute-key-definition' is unusable (at least with > `self-insert-command'), for performance reasons. Regardless of the advantages of comm

RE: command remapping problem

2006-01-31 Thread Drew Adams
> I'm not sure what you mean. Command remapping for > `self-insert-command' is > not the problem - that works fine. As I said, I do, as a > workaround, use > command remapping for `self-insert-command' and > `substitute-key-definition' > for all other commands. This is a

Re: command remapping problem

2006-01-31 Thread Kim F. Storm
"Richard M. Stallman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > lost functionality in going to Emacs 22, because > > `substitute-key-definition' is unusable (at least with > > `self-insert-command'), for performance reasons. > > Could someone please investigate the slowness, and resp

Re: command remapping problem

2006-01-31 Thread Miles Bader
2006/2/1, Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > + DEFUN ("indirect-function-noerror", Findirect_function_noerror, > Sindirect_function_noerror, 1, 1, 0, ... > + If the final symbol is unbound, return OBJECT Instead of making a new function, how about adding an optional "default" argument to the exi