Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Every morning for the past weeks, I've had a message in my minibuffer
> that roughly goes, "Desktop undo buffer is 3+ MB, discard? (yes or no)".
> I've been saying "yes". This morning, feeling snarky, I said "no" and
> Emacs crashed.
>
$ emacs -Q
Insert
(compose-region 1 2 "")
in the *scratch* buffer and evaluate it.
Emacs crashes during redisplay:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
set_glyph_string_background_width (s=0x0, start=1, last_x=892) at xdisp.c:19150
19150 if (start == s->row->used[s->ar
I have a new idea. We could establish the convention that you can
pass a buffer to find-operation-coding-system instead of a file name,
for the `insert-file-contents' operation. And elements of
Vfile_coding_system_alist could have symbols instead of regexps; the
symbol would match the buffer's ma
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a new idea. We could establish the convention that you can
> pass a buffer to find-operation-coding-system instead of a file name,
> for the `insert-file-contents' operation. And elements of
> Vfile_coding_syst
