Re: Sporadic segmentation faults

2006-05-15 Thread Kim F. Storm
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is this a good fix? I already installed a (similar) fix. *** xterm.c 31 Mar 2006 12:37:36 -0500 1.910 --- xterm.c 14 May 2006 13:19:01 -0400 *** *** 6083,6090 f = x_any_window_to_frame (dpyinfo,

Re: GNU Emacs 23.0.0 does not compile: ‘struct coding_system’ has no member named ‘eol _type’

2006-05-15 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 15.05.2006 um 07:01 schrieb Kenichi Handa: This was because of incomplete (semi-auto) synching with HEAD. I've already install fixes. And it compiles! -- Greetings Pete The mathematician who pursues his studies without clear views of this matter, must often have the uncomfortable

gud-tooltip-mode: gdb-prompt: Wrong number of arguments

2006-05-15 Thread Klaus Zeitler
Whith gud-tooltip-mode turned on I get, when I move the pointer over a variable: error in process filter: gdb-prompt: Wrong number of arguments: #[(expr) =c4r=c5=c6!q=88eb=88=c7=c8=c9=ca#=83 =86+ In GNU Emacs 22.0.50.13 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8, Motif Version 2.1.0) of 2006-05-15 on sfsws4 X

gud-tooltip-mode: gdb-prompt: Wrong number of arguments

2006-05-15 Thread Nick Roberts
Whith gud-tooltip-mode turned on I get, when I move the pointer over a variable: error in process filter: gdb-prompt: Wrong number of arguments: #[(expr) =c4r=c5=c6!q=88eb=88=c7=c8=c9=ca#=83 =86+ I've fixed this. GUD tooltips work better if you compile with -g3 (assuming thats

How to use xft font in unicode-xft branch

2006-05-15 Thread Leon
Hi there, Just compiled unicode-xft and it works. I don't know how to use xft fonts. And it seems no document at all about the xft branch. For example, emacs -fn mono will give ,[ emacs -fn mono ] | Font `mono' is not defined ` Any idea how to test if emacs has xft support?? -- Leon

Re: add info about safe-local-variable to describe-variable

2006-05-15 Thread Ken Manheimer
in light of these new realizations, i'm attaching a new allout patch and changelog. reiner, i really like the compromise of using the simple predicates for safe-local-variable property qualifiers, when available, and falling back to the lambdas when they're not. this patch includes changes that

Re: add info about safe-local-variable to describe-variable

2006-05-15 Thread Reiner Steib
On Mon, May 15 2006, Ken Manheimer wrote: in light of these new realizations, i'm attaching a new allout patch and changelog. reiner, i really like the compromise of using the simple predicates for safe-local-variable property qualifiers, when available, and falling back to the lambdas when

Re: add info about safe-local-variable to describe-variable

2006-05-15 Thread Ken Manheimer
sorry - i guess i shipped that patch with too little sleep, or something. i had attached the prior copy of the ChangeLog (which i overwrote with the new one in the filesystem, but didn't re-attached after doing so), and neglected to adjust the version numbers to remove the CVS tokens i keep in