Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also exiting an emacs that contains such shells still alive (merely
> sitting at their prompts), sends the signal to them to get wacko.
>
> That sounds like a shell bug to me.
>
> Does it happen with Emacs 21.4 too?
Yes, I can reproduce this
Also exiting an emacs that contains such shells still alive (merely
sitting at their prompts), sends the signal to them to get wacko.
That sounds like a shell bug to me.
Does it happen with Emacs 21.4 too?
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
em
Also exiting an emacs that contains such shells still alive (merely
sitting at their prompts), sends the signal to them to get wacko.
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
SJ> I have IGNOREEOF=2 in /root/.bashrc.
It turns out with greater IGNOREEOF's, and more "fg"'s, the sucker
heads straight for the HISTFILE where it proceeds to execute all the
commands there faster than you can kill(1) them. "A monster has taken
over my '*shell*' buffer and is sending root ^P^O&'
The fix will be installed soon.
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> At least you perhaps can reproduce in an emacs *shell* buffer:
> ---
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
> Password:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# suspend
>
> [1]+ Stopped su
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fg
> su
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# exit <---I did not typ
GM> I cannot reproduce this.
At least you perhaps can reproduce in an emacs *shell* buffer:
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ su
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# suspend
[1]+ Stopped su
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ fg
su
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp# exit <---I did not type "exit"!
[EMAIL
