>> 3. Append a space to the fourth commented line. Bug: fontification of Foo,
>> bar, Snafu and snafu is removed from that line.
> The problem is that after a textual change, the changed line gets
> fontified as an atomic entity, i.e. yanked out of its context. The
If you placed a font-lock-mu
Hi, Simon; Hi, Richard!
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:22:00PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Please DTRT.
> --- Start of forwarded message ---
> From: "Marshall, Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Emacs Pretest Bug (emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org)'"
>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:46:04 +0
Afternoon, Stefan!
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 11:11:45PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> 3. Append a space to the fourth commented line. Bug:
> >> fontification of Foo, bar, Snafu and snafu is removed from that
> >> line.
> > The problem is that after a textual change, the changed line gets
> >
> Put the following in a fubar.cpp:
> class Fubar :
> public Foo, // Foo fontified as a type, at first
> public Bar// Bar fontified as a type, at first
> {
> Foo bar(Snafu snafu, // Types, function, variable fontified, at first
> Foo foo,
> Bar bar);
> Foo bar(Snafu *snafu, // Types, functi
>> >> 3. Append a space to the fourth commented line. Bug:
>> >> fontification of Foo, bar, Snafu and snafu is removed from that
>> >> line.
>> > The problem is that after a textual change, the changed line gets
>> > fontified as an atomic entity, i.e. yanked out of its context. The
>> If you
Evening, Stefan!
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:36:08AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> >> 3. Append a space to the fourth commented line. Bug:
> >> >> fontification of Foo, bar, Snafu and snafu is removed from that
> >> >> line.
> >> > The problem is that after a textual change, the changed line
> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:48:36 + (GMT)
> From: Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Subject: font-lock-extend-region-function: Final refinements.
> It hasn't as yet been installed, although it would
Hi, Stefan!
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:43:14PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 12:48:36 + (GMT)
> > From: Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > Subject: font-lock-extend-re
>> You haven't shown any evidence of inefficiency.
> I think I have, in our previous discussion. I think it's clear that
> f-l-multiline properties are erased throughout the change-region, and
> have to be recalculated througout the change region, at every change.
> For most C-like languages, thi
Hi, Stefan!
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:35:08AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> The patch below seems to fix number 2 and 3 for me. Someone who
> understands cc-fonts.el better than me and thus knows where the two
> "public XXX" lines are handled could probably do a similar adjustment
> for them.
>> The patch below seems to fix number 2 and 3 for me. Someone who
>> understands cc-fonts.el better than me and thus knows where the two
>> "public XXX" lines are handled could probably do a similar adjustment
>> for them.
> At the very least, this isn't suitable for the CC Mode repository, sinc
To speak of "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs" gives the impression that XEmacs
has nothing to do with GNU. Since XEmacs is a forked version of Emacs,
that is a misleading impression. Please write "Emacs" and "XEmacs",
or else "GNU Emacs" and "GNU XEmacs".
___
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To speak of "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs" gives the impression that XEmacs
> has nothing to do with GNU. Since XEmacs is a forked version of Emacs,
> that is a misleading impression. Please write "Emacs" and "XEmacs",
> or else "GNU Emacs" and "GNU XEmac
Good morning, Richard!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:59:55PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> To speak of "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs" gives the impression that XEmacs
> has nothing to do with GNU.
XEmacs isn't maintained by the GNU project.
> Since XEmacs is a forked version of Emacs, that is a misle
Morning, Stefan!
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:03:41PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> The patch below seems to fix number 2 and 3 for me. Someone who
> >> understands cc-fonts.el better than me and thus knows where the two
> >> "public XXX" lines are handled could probably do a similar
> >> adjus
Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good morning, Richard!
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:59:55PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
>> To speak of "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs" gives the impression that
>> XEmacs has nothing to do with GNU.
>
> XEmacs isn't maintained by the GNU project.
Corre
> As a matter of interest, does the f-l-multiline mechanism somehow work
> with a _first_ fontification? Assume CC Mode has been enhanced to use
> f-l-multiline. Say we have a buffer of C source in fundamental mode (so
> there're no f-l-m properties on the buffer), and the top of the screen
> is
'Evening, Stefan!
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:55:41AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > As a matter of interest, does the f-l-multiline mechanism somehow
> > work with a _first_ fontification? Assume CC Mode has been enhanced
> > to use f-l-multiline. Say we have a buffer of C source in
> > fundam
> It seems that the identification of the "safe place" (in a previously
> unfontified region) needs to be done by a function essentially the same
> as font-lock-extend-region-function, since f-l-multiline properties
> haven't yet been applied. In that case, what is the advantage in using
> f-l-mul
> To speak of "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs" gives the impression that XEmacs
> has nothing to do with GNU. Since XEmacs is a forked version of Emacs,
> that is a misleading impression. Please write "Emacs" and "XEmacs",
> or else "GNU Emacs" and "GNU XEmacs".
But XEmacs is not a G
"Emacs", unqualified, can be ambiguous. It can mean either (i) "an
editor of the Emacs persuasion"; or (ii) "the best editor in the world,
maintained by the GNU project". In contexts where it is important to
emphasise that (ii) is meant, surely "GNU Emacs" is what to write.
Tha
Ar an t-aonú lá is triochad de mí Iúil, scríobh Richard Stallman:
> To speak of "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs" gives the impression that XEmacs has
> nothing to do with GNU. Since XEmacs is a forked version of Emacs, that
> is a misleading impression. Please write "Emacs" and "XEmacs", or else
>
Aidan Kehoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ar an t-aonú lá is triochad de mí Iúil, scríobh Richard Stallman:
>
> > To speak of "GNU Emacs" and "XEmacs" gives the impression that XEmacs has
> > nothing to do with GNU. Since XEmacs is a forked version of Emacs, that
> > is a misleading impressio
Ar an dara lá de mí Lúnasa, scríobh David Kastrup:
> And we use the term "Emacs" for referring to Emacs.
> When the term "GNU Emacs" is used, it is to draw attention to the GNU
> project and the part Emacs plays within it, not to insinuate that the
> scope of Emacs is supposed to be restri
Aidan Kehoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ar an dara lá de mí Lúnasa, scríobh David Kastrup:
>
> > And we use the term "Emacs" for referring to Emacs.
>
> > When the term "GNU Emacs" is used, it is to draw attention to the
> > GNU project and the part Emacs plays within it, not to insinuate
>
For distinguishing the two versions I write "Emacs" and "XEmacs",
because the context shows we are talking about these two variants
of the original GNU Emacs.
In other contexts, there is no need to refer to the two variants but
there is a need to connect Emacs with the GNU system. There I write
"
Morning, Stefan!
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:23:54PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > It seems that the identification of the "safe place" (in a previously
> > unfontified region) needs to be done by a function essentially the
> > same as font-lock-extend-region-function, since f-l-multiline
> > pr
Morning, Richard!
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:20:12PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> For distinguishing the two versions I write "Emacs" and "XEmacs",
> because the context shows we are talking about these two variants
> of the original GNU Emacs.
This leaves a difficulty when there is no contex
Alan Mackenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Morning, Richard!
>
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:20:12PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> For distinguishing the two versions I write "Emacs" and "XEmacs",
>> because the context shows we are talking about these two variants
>> of the original GNU Emac
>> > It seems that the identification of the "safe place" (in a previously
>> > unfontified region) needs to be done by a function essentially the
>> > same as font-lock-extend-region-function, since f-l-multiline
>> > properties haven't yet been applied. In that case, what is the
>> > advantage i
I believe "GNU Emacs" is used mainly for unambiguous identification
rather than connecting it with the GNU system - much like "John of
Gaunt" is used to clarify which John you're talking about rather than to
associate him with the town of Gent in Belgium.
Yes, exactly.
> For d
31 matches
Mail list logo
