> Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
> From: Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:22:59 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> I guess we could rewrite the install target in lisp/Makefile so that
> >> it copies the *.el files first.
> >
> > Done. Please resync
Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess we could rewrite the install target in lisp/Makefile so that
>> it copies the *.el files first.
>
> Done. Please resync with the CVS and see if the problem is gone.
It works fine, thank you.
___
em
> From: Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:44:18 +0200
>
> I'm not aware of any cp implementation that doesn't support `-p' and I
> didn't find anything wrt this in (info "(autoconf)Limitations of Usual
> Tool
> From: Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 03:50:49 -0400
> Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
>
> I guess we could rewrite the install target in lisp/Makefile so that
> it copies the *.el files first.
Done. Please resync with the CVS and see if the problem is gone.
On Wed, Jul 11 2007, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> -CP = cp -f
>> -CP_DIR = cp -rf
>> +CP = cp -fp
>> +CP_DIR = cp -rfp
>
> Thanks, but I don't want to rely on a GNU `cp' without checking.
I'm not aware of any cp implementation that doesn't support `-p' and I
d
> From: Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:12:24 +0800
>
> Windows XP SP2, FAT32 filesystem (both source and dest).
Hmm, it might be an issue with FAT32 timestamps. Could you please add
"-v" to the `cp' switches and post here everything that `cp' displays
while copying the
Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Make won't do any multi-processing unless you use the -j switch. Did
> you?
I didn't use the -j switch.
[...]
> Please tell the details of the system on which this happens: what
> Windows version, on what type of filesystem(s) (NTFS, FAT, other) you
> From: Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:37:41 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If they have the same timestamps, why do you get "source is newer"
> > messages? I don't get them on my machine, and lread.c explicitly
> > checks for .elc time _less
Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If they have the same timestamps, why do you get "source is newer"
> messages? I don't get them on my machine, and lread.c explicitly
> checks for .elc time _less_ than the .el time, not _less_or_equal_.
> Could you please look closer at this problem an
> From: Zhang Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:06:40 +0800
>
> The `cp' command of my installation don't preserve timestamps by
> default
`cp' never did. Only the Windows copy commands do.
> that makes the .elc files and the .el files have same timestamps as they
> are instal
The `cp' command of my installation don't preserve timestamps by
default, that command comes from the GNU coreutils 5.3.0 package:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
D:\download\emacs-gbk\nt>cp --version
cp (GNU coreutils) 5.3.0
Written by Torbjorn Granlund, David Ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
