Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:37:02 +0100
From: Jason Rumney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kim F. Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED], emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
The only thing left is to silence the compiler warning about
w32-shell-dos-semantics not being defined on other platforms. Is
(defun
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:09:19 +0200
From: Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Kim F. Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Is there not a unix style shell for DOS too?
Yes, there's a DOS port of Bash. However, the users of the DOS port
of Emacs (if there still are any
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kim F. Storm wrote:
The problem on w32 is that w32 sends a message to the process when
delete-process is used. W32 then expects the process to answer to some
w32 message (can't remember which one right now). Cygwin does not
answer to this message.
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
find . ( -type f -exec grep -q -e message {} ; ) -exec ls -ld {} ;
Thanks, that expression works with the GnuWin32 port of GNU find and
CMD.exe.
To remove the bugs I suggest the following approach:
1) A new function quote-special-characters that
Lennart Borgman wrote:
1) A new function quote-special-characters that will quote characters
like (); if it is a unix style shell.
If we DTRT in shell-quote-argument, then we don't need to introduce
further complication.
2) A new function w32-shell-is-unix-style that looks at
Jason Rumney wrote:
We already have w32-system-shells, which is the inverse of the
variable you propose (except it is missing cmdproxy.exe, I am not
sure if there is a good reason for that).
In fact we have a function w32-shell-dos-semantics for precisely this
purpose. So a suitable patch
Jason Rumney wrote:
Jason Rumney wrote:
We already have w32-system-shells, which is the inverse of the
variable you propose (except it is missing cmdproxy.exe, I am not
sure if there is a good reason for that).
In fact we have a function w32-shell-dos-semantics for precisely this
purpose. So
The problem on w32 is that w32 sends a message to the process when
delete-process is used. W32 then expects the process to answer to some
w32 message (can't remember which one right now). Cygwin does not answer
to this message. Then w32 shows a dialog box and asks the user what
Kim F. Storm wrote:
How can the choice of firewall influence whether delete-process
works or not?
I do not know. I just know that when I reverted to my old firewall the
problem seems to be (nearly) gone. And I know that with the other
firewall things sometimes slowed down to a crawl.
I am
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is probably waiting for some event then. A backtrace
should show you where it is waiting, and the state may
then show you what it is waiting for.
Is there any way to get that when Emacs is frozen?
Run it in a debugger, and stop it when it's
Thanks. I did not notice and now I know why. When using Cygwin for
the inferior process trying to use kill-find just hangs Emacs. So
there is a bug here.
kill-find now uses `delete-process'. Using `interrupt-process' or
kill-process' works instead. Is there any reason
Lennart Borgman wrote:
There seem to be another bug on w32 too. I just tried using CMD.EXE
for the inferior process instead. That does not seem to work at all. I
got this:
d:/ecvs/:
find . \( -type f -exec grep -q -e message {} \; \) -exec ls -ld
{} \;
find: missing argument to `-exec'
Richard Stallman wrote:
Thanks. I did not notice and now I know why. When using Cygwin for
the inferior process trying to use kill-find just hangs Emacs. So
there is a bug here.
kill-find now uses `delete-process'. Using `interrupt-process' or
kill-process' works
Jason Rumney wrote:
Lennart Borgman wrote:
There seem to be another bug on w32 too. I just tried using CMD.EXE
for the inferior process instead. That does not seem to work at all.
I got this:
d:/ecvs/:
find . \( -type f -exec grep -q -e message {} \; \) -exec ls -ld
{} \;
find: missing
Lennart Borgman wrote:
Jason Rumney wrote:
Lennart Borgman wrote:
There seem to be another bug on w32 too. I just tried using CMD.EXE
for the inferior process instead. That does not seem to work at all.
I got this:
d:/ecvs/:
find . \( -type f -exec grep -q -e message {} \; \) -exec ls
Lennart Borgman wrote:
I think there is a bug in shell-quote-argument that is used here. This
function does not care about shell-file-name. How can quoting succeed
if it does not do that?
Indeed, that is a problem, as is the blind wrapping in double quotes on
w32 when ms-dos has a much more
Jason Rumney wrote:
Lennart Borgman wrote:
I think there is a bug in shell-quote-argument that is used here.
This function does not care about shell-file-name. How can quoting
succeed if it does not do that?
Indeed, that is a problem, as is the blind wrapping in double quotes
on w32 when
Lennart Borgman wrote:
In any case the command string that is built and send to CMD does not
work. Here I am using the GnuWin32 port of find, version 4.2.20. Find
complains about the first -exec:
find . \( -type f -exec grep -q -e message {} \; \) -exec ls -ld
{} \;
find: missing
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Stallman wrote:
Thanks. I did not notice and now I know why. When using Cygwin for
the inferior process trying to use kill-find just hangs Emacs. So
there is a bug here.
kill-find now uses `delete-process'. Using
Kim F. Storm wrote:
The problem on w32 is that w32 sends a message to the process when
delete-process is used. W32 then expects the process to answer to some
w32 message (can't remember which one right now). Cygwin does not
answer to this message. Then w32 shows a dialog box and asks the user
Jason Rumney wrote:
Lennart Borgman wrote:
In any case the command string that is built and send to CMD does not
work. Here I am using the GnuWin32 port of find, version 4.2.20. Find
complains about the first -exec:
find . \( -type f -exec grep -q -e message {} \; \) -exec ls
-ld {} \;
Lennart Borgman wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see C-c C-k already has that meaning in the buffers made by M-x grep
and M-x compile. So let's set it up to kill the process of
find-grep-dired as well.
It already does.
Andreas.
Thanks. I
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lennart Borgman wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see C-c C-k already has that meaning in the buffers made by M-x grep
and M-x compile. So let's set it up to kill the process of
find-grep-dired as well.
Kim F. Storm wrote:
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lennart Borgman wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see C-c C-k already has that meaning in the buffers made by M-x grep
and M-x compile. So let's set it up to
Kim F. Storm wrote:
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kim F. Storm wrote:
Lennart Borgman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lennart Borgman wrote:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
25 matches
Mail list logo
