I think I finally got this right (I hope) someone please confirm
--
(I check (functionp (indirect-function sym))
before I do anything like calling interactive-form --
incidentally calling interactive-form was also automatically
loading files.
While debugging this, I also noticed that there is a p
But here is the problem though:
How do I find out after having called (functionp sym)
and getting back T if the function is already loaded? I was using
symbol-function as a guard to make sure I only called
(interactive-form on true functions
> "Kevin" == Kevin Rodgers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writ
Thanks for the tip!
> "Kevin" == Kevin Rodgers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> 1) In using reflection, it ends up loading tpu-extras.el
>>> (even though I have no intention of using tpu)
>>
>> This is a problem in Emacspeak: it should not its
Stefan Monnier wrote:
1) In using reflection, it ends up loading tpu-extras.el (even
though I have no intention of using tpu)
This is a problem in Emacspeak: it should not itself load packages.
Indeed. Raman, compare the results of
(functionp 'tpu-edt)
(functionp (symbol-
There is perhaps something I dont quite understand about the
Emacs CVS repos.
I'm using:
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/emacs
and building this results in a version that calls itself
22.1.50.x -- is that a "branch" or a "trunk"?
Also, is there something newer called Emacs 23 in the CVS
rep
> Just did a CVS update, and I still see the old version of
> tpu-extras in the sources i.e. it defines newline.
I fixed it in the 22 branch, so it may take a few more days for it to get
merged into the trunk.
Stefan
___
emacs-pretest-bug ma
Just did a CVS update, and I still see the old version of
tpu-extras in the sources i.e. it defines newline.
Thanks for the fix.
> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2) Worse, tpu-extras is evil -- it redefines things like
>> newline
Stefan> Should be "fix
Thanks for the fix.
> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2) Worse, tpu-extras is evil -- it redefines things like
>> newline
Stefan> Should be "fixed" now (it uses advice and only
Stefan> activates it when needed).
Stefan>
Stefan>
Stefan>
> Perhaps we should put the tpu-extras.el autoloads into tpu-edt.el
> instead of into loaddefs.el. I think that only tpu users
> would want to call those entry points.
> Stefan, you know how to do that. Would you please do that?
It's done here, I'm just waiting for syncs and a few other things
> 2) Worse, tpu-extras is evil -- it redefines things like newline
Should be "fixed" now (it uses advice and only activates it when needed).
Stefan
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
> With loaddefs.el in Emacs 22, rarely used packages like tpu end up
> showing up in the default obarray operated upon by mapatoms. Is there
> a way to avoid this?
Not without increasing the amount of work people need to do to enable TPU
emulation, so I think this is not an option.
> 0) mapatom
2) Worse, tpu-extras is evil -- it redefines things like newline
That is ugly, the same way advice is ugly, but the change to the
behavior of `newline' is harmless enough.
3) And even worse, tpu-current-line (used by the redefined newline)
raises errors at times when called fro
With loaddefs.el in Emacs 22, rarely used packages
like tpu end up showing up in the default obarray operated upon
by mapatoms. Is there a way to avoid this?
The only easy way is to delete the autoloads.
But why do that? There are not very many of them.
0) mapatoms finds command
With loaddefs.el in Emacs 22, rarely used packages
like tpu end up showing up in the default obarray operated upon
by mapatoms. Is there a way to avoid this?
I use reflection via mapatoms to find interactive commands that
need to be speech-enabled in Emacspeak, and one unfortunate
consequence is
14 matches
Mail list logo
