Re: M-x gdb with large files

2006-05-31 Thread Klaus Zeitler
Nick == Nick Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nick Nick You might need to check that there aren't other buffers present Nick which just aren't visible. I start emacs with option -Q and the buffer listing shows: . * *gud-umc.vx* 1140 Debugger:run *scratch*

Re: M-x gdb with large files

2006-05-31 Thread Nick Roberts
When I start gdb in emacs, 'top' shows that gdb is running at about 50% CPU for more than a minute and then the load goes slowly down to a value below 1%. This takes about 2 minutes. Another thing that is a bit odd is, that the gdb prompt in emacs appears after about 15 seconds, which

Re: M-x gdb with large files

2006-05-30 Thread Nick Roberts
Nick Is it a new problem? i.e. did it work previously? Yes and yes Then I think it's due to the recent changes in eval-after-load not gdb-ui. I could trace this down to the following lines in my .emacs file: (eval-after-load gdb-ui '(progn (message

Re: M-x gdb with large files

2006-05-30 Thread Nick Roberts
Nick Did you do this with gdb-many-windows set to t? tried it with gdb-many-windows set to t or nil, doesn't seem to make a difference. You might need to check that there aren't other buffers present which just aren't visible. Nick How deep is your stack? Only 9 frames

Re: M-x gdb with large files

2006-05-29 Thread Klaus Zeitler
Nick == Nick Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nick Nick Did you do this with gdb-many-windows set to t? tried it with gdb-many-windows set to t or nil, doesn't seem to make a difference. Nick How deep is your stack? Only 9 frames in this case, but we have about 130 threads,

Re: M-x gdb with large files

2006-05-29 Thread Nick Roberts
BTW there must be a new problem with the newest CVS version. A call like: M-x gdb - gdb --annotate=3 umc.vx gives me the following error (taken from *Messages*): Is it a new problem? i.e. did it work previously? --- snip --- Configuring gdb-ui error in process filter: apply: Args out

M-x gdb with large files [was Re: gud-tooltip-mode:...]

2006-05-27 Thread Nick Roberts
I also have serious performance issues with the new gdb interface, e.g. gdb --fullname image-name core and then up or bt in gdb takes a bit more than 20 seconds, whereas gdba -annotate=3 image-name core and then up or bt needs 2 and a half minutes. This is almost certainly not an