Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-22 Thread Luc Teirlinck
Stefan Monnier wrote: > It seems the only good way to handle all cases is preserving the > window configuration before first M-TAB, and restoring it afterwards. The *Completions* buffer may be displayed in a different frame. Preserve the frame configuration? Sincerely, Luc.

Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-22 Thread Stefan Monnier
>>> Stefan, there's a bug in your latest changes to this function: when a >>> completion has been found, the *Completions* buffer is buried but its >>> window remains visible. In previous versions, the window was deleted >>> as well. >> >> If you do it the other way around you also have a bug in

Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-22 Thread Juri Linkov
>> Stefan, there's a bug in your latest changes to this function: when a >> completion has been found, the *Completions* buffer is buried but its >> window remains visible. In previous versions, the window was deleted >> as well. > > If you do it the other way around you also have a bug in that it

Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-22 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> Thanks, but I have a write access only to Gnus (in cvs.gnus.org >> which is gatewayed to Emacs CVS), I haven't worked on the paper >> to Emacs. Could anyone please take it on? > Thanks, I resynchronized your patch and installed it. And by the way, > you do have papers for Emacs. > Stefan, th

Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-22 Thread Katsumi Yamaoka
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Romain Francoise wrote: > Thanks, I resynchronized your patch and installed it. Thanks for your work so quickly. > And by the way, you do have papers for Emacs. Yes, I'll do it. :) ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emac

Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-21 Thread Romain Francoise
Katsumi Yamaoka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks, but I have a write access only to Gnus (in cvs.gnus.org > which is gatewayed to Emacs CVS), I haven't worked on the paper > to Emacs. Could anyone please take it on? Thanks, I resynchronized your patch and installed it. And by the way, you d

Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-21 Thread Katsumi Yamaoka
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Richard M. Stallman wrote: > Please install your patch. Thanks, but I have a write access only to Gnus (in cvs.gnus.org which is gatewayed to Emacs CVS), I haven't worked on the paper to Emacs. Could anyone please take it on? ___

Re: lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-21 Thread Richard M. Stallman
Please install your patch. ___ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug

lisp-complete-symbol is too loquacious in minibuffer

2005-12-20 Thread Katsumi Yamaoka
Hi, When I perform eval-expression in the minibuffer and complete some lisp symbol using the M-TAB key, the result is hidden by the message "Making completion list...done" for a while. That is annoying. It doesn't occur when I perform find-file, etc. Could it be modified as the following? Thank