Re: log-view-minor-wrap

2006-01-25 Thread Stefan Monnier
>>> With the latest change in log-view.el, typing `=' on a revision in the >>> *cvs-info* shows the reverse diff. That's because the first argument of >>> cvs-diff functions should be the revision at the next older revision, >>> and the second argument should be the revision at point. >> >> But w

Re: log-view-minor-wrap

2006-01-25 Thread Juri Linkov
>> With the latest change in log-view.el, typing `=' on a revision in the >> *cvs-info* shows the reverse diff. That's because the first argument of >> cvs-diff functions should be the revision at the next older revision, >> and the second argument should be the revision at point. > > But without

Re: log-view-minor-wrap

2006-01-24 Thread Stefan Monnier
> With the latest change in log-view.el, typing `=' on a revision in the > *cvs-info* shows the reverse diff. That's because the first argument of > cvs-diff functions should be the revision at the next older revision, > and the second argument should be the revision at point. But without this la

log-view-minor-wrap (was: vc-annotate tries to load vc-nil)

2006-01-24 Thread Juri Linkov
With the latest change in log-view.el, typing `=' on a revision in the *cvs-info* shows the reverse diff. That's because the first argument of cvs-diff functions should be the revision at the next older revision, and the second argument should be the revision at point. -- Juri Linkov http://www.