Juanma Barranquero wrote:
On 12/31/06, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it perhaps be better to have default t on systems where file name
case does not matter?
You should've read the docstring...
Yes, or I should have just understood it probably had been made this way
;-)
On 12/31/06, Lennart Borgman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it perhaps be better to have default t on systems where file name
case does not matter?
You should've read the docstring...
(defcustom auto-mode-case-fold nil
"Non-nil means to try second pass through `auto-mode-alist'.
This means
Kim F. Storm wrote:
Done. The new option is called auto-mode-case-fold -- defaulting to nil.
Would it perhaps be better to have default t on systems where file name
case does not matter?
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What was the conclusion on how to associate .PY files with python-mode?
>>> And what about .TXT files, .HTM files, .TAR files, and so on?
>>>
>>> I think it is a mistake to do that, in general.
>>> I would not object to a user option to enable such m
>> What was the conclusion on how to associate .PY files with python-mode?
>> And what about .TXT files, .HTM files, .TAR files, and so on?
>>
>> I think it is a mistake to do that, in general.
>> I would not object to a user option to enable such matching,
>> but it should not be enabled by defau
> What was the conclusion on how to associate .PY files with python-mode?
> And what about .TXT files, .HTM files, .TAR files, and so on?
> I think it is a mistake to do that, in general.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of this thought.
Can't you come up with one anecdotal/hypothetica
Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What was the conclusion on how to associate .PY files with python-mode?
> And what about .TXT files, .HTM files, .TAR files, and so on?
>
> I think it is a mistake to do that, in general.
> I would not object to a user option to enable such ma
What was the conclusion on how to associate .PY files with python-mode?
And what about .TXT files, .HTM files, .TAR files, and so on?
I think it is a mistake to do that, in general.
I would not object to a user option to enable such matching,
but it should not be enabled by default.
On 12/29/06, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This change is ok.
OK, I've installed it.
Kim, you talked about auto-detecting only JPEG image files. If you
think it is better to do that right now (I really don't have an
opinion), just set the values of the other image types to nil i
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am not going to approve this change. It is basically not correct.
>
> It's still not clear to me why fundamental-mode is more correct than
> a major-mode derived from case-insensitive matching. But I'll just wait
> a couple years and hope you'll se
> I am not going to approve this change. It is basically not correct.
It's still not clear to me why fundamental-mode is more correct than
a major-mode derived from case-insensitive matching. But I'll just wait
a couple years and hope you'll see the light in the mean time,
Stefan
___
> I am not going to approve this change. It is basically not correct.
Which one? The change for case-insensitive checking, or the other?
I was responding to the change for case-insensitive checking.
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pr
It uses a separate `image-type-auto-detectable' alist (which makes
more sense IMO) and a new `image-type-auto-detected-p' function for
`magic-mode-alist'. (I'm not particularly fond of the names, BTW.)
This change is ok.
___
emacs-pretest-b
> - Adding `image-type-from-buffer' to `magic-mode-alist'. That's not
> good because there is one type of file (postscript) whose
> interpretation is ambiguous under that function.
It isn't ambiguous. This works correctly now.
___
emacs-
On 12/28/06, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not going to approve this change. It is basically not correct.
Which one? The change for case-insensitive checking, or the other?
/L/e/k/t/u
___
emacs-pretest-bug ma
I am not going to approve this change. It is basically not correct.
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
On 12/28/06, Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, but if we had just added Stefan patch now, the rest of the patches
would not have been needed "before the release".
BTW, wasn't the approach in Stefan's patch more-or-less vetoed by
Richard (even if most of us find this fix good and no
On 12/28/06, Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure, but if we had just added Stefan patch now, the rest of the patches
would not have been needed "before the release".
Yes, of course. (BTW, I'm not particularly interested in this stuff,
or in getting it "in", just trying to be helpful.)
"Juanma Barranquero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 12/27/06, Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> In contrast, the "recognize images by file contents" approach has already
>> required three rounds of bug-fixing ... and there's no guarantee that there
>> are not more "surprises"...
>
> W
On 12/28/06, Juanma Barranquero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think a good approach would be to add Stefan patch, remove the
NOT-ALWAYS stuff and fix `magic-mode-alist' to use a function
specifically designed to detect image types.
(I should've said "to detect image files").
The following is a
On 12/27/06, Kim F. Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In contrast, the "recognize images by file contents" approach has already
required three rounds of bug-fixing ... and there's no guarantee that there
are not more "surprises"...
Well, I think that's not entirely fair. Patches for that approa
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's at the very best a misfeature. Far from a feature.
> See sample patch below to fix this problem.
This code is exactly what we need!
It is simple, localized, easy to document, and have no really severe
effects if it guesses wrong - as the worst e
>> I'm browsing some old Python sources on a CD, and they're all opening
>> in fundamental-mode instead of python-mode.
>>
>> All the filenames on the CD are in uppercase.
>>
>> Perhaps python-mode.el could be modified to recognise .PY files as
>> well as .py files as containing Python code?
> T
Chris Moore wrote:
I'm browsing some old Python sources on a CD, and they're all opening
in fundamental-mode instead of python-mode.
All the filenames on the CD are in uppercase.
Perhaps python-mode.el could be modified to recognise .PY files as
well as .py files as containing Python code?
Th
I'm browsing some old Python sources on a CD, and they're all opening
in fundamental-mode instead of python-mode.
All the filenames on the CD are in uppercase.
Perhaps python-mode.el could be modified to recognise .PY files as
well as .py files as containing Python code?
I've not tried opening
25 matches
Mail list logo
