Sure, but I don't have access to commit the patch.
Please send the patch again.
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
Sure, but I don't have access to commit the patch.
Please send the patch again.
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sure, but I don't have access to commit the patch.
Please send the patch again.
I just tried, but got bounces both from you directly and from the
list.
From: Mail Delivery
Chris Moore wrote:
I'm not confident about it. It seems to be working well for me still,
but there's quite a lot of functionality available at the
query-replace prompt which I neither understand nor use.
All the replacement actions seem to work in my experience. The ones I
tested were the
Aaron S. Hawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug is really worth fixing. Otherwise, the lisp expression
aspect of `query-replace-regexp' will behave /unnecessarily/ slow.
Sure, but I don't have access to commit the patch.
Can someone who does please take a look and check it in if it's OK?
Quoting Chris Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aaron S. Hawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then, do the most basic of replacements that would never be done in
practice, but shows how slow interactive regexp replacements can be:
Or just replace it with \,\ for an even simpler test case.
Damn right.
Aaron S. Hawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Chris Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Or just replace it with \,\ for an even simpler test case.
Damn right.
Or:
\,
makes it one character shorter, and gives lie to
replace-match-string-symbols's docstring. It turns out that doesn't
need to be
Aaron S. Hawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then, do the most basic of replacements that would never be done in
practice, but shows how slow interactive regexp replacements can be:
Or just replace it with \,\ for an even simpler test case.
Does this patch fix the bug?
--- old/replace.el
Search and evaluated replace expressions with `query-replace-regexp'
are a bit slow and do not scale well to large files, even with the
simplest of lisp expressions, in particular when using automatic
replace of all matches by hitting !?
For instance, create a buffer `foo' with 200 lines
