On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:19:14 +, David Reitter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
(x-display-screens) returns 1, and (x-display-list) returns only
(Mac), despite me running two monitors with the desktop spanning
across them. That's odd - I would expect to see both displays
listed.
The concept
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu skrev:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:19:14 +, David Reitter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
(x-display-screens) returns 1, and (x-display-list) returns only
(Mac), despite me running two monitors with the desktop spanning
across them. That's odd - I would expect to see both displays
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:10:38 +0100, Jan Djärv [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The concept of screen in X11 is different from what you are
thinking about. One window cannot span multiple screens. I
guess you are thinking about a framebuffer in Xinerama extension.
The build he had done was
On 24 Mar 2007, at 10:21, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:
Right, but if you have one X11 screen on two monitors, it should
return the total width. This seems to not be the case when
compiling for native OSX.
OK, how about this? x-display-mm-{width,height} are changed so as to
keep the dpi values
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:49:03 +, David Reitter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
OK, how about this? x-display-mm-{width,height} are changed so as
to keep the dpi values of the main display.
Sure, that would make it a bit more consistent. However, the -mm-
functions weren't really my concern.
On 24 Mar 2007, at 11:37, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote:
Sure, that would make it a bit more consistent. However, the -mm-
functions weren't really my concern.
I've heard that preview-latex uses these functions to display images
in real size.
... in which case pixel and millimeter dimensions
